Matches in DBpedia 2015-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 triples per page.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs abstract "Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial".".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs wikiPageExternalLink 1mkvl.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs wikiPageID "10604120".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs wikiPageRevisionID "641867759".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs caseName "Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs citations "[1979] 1 SCR 311, 1978 CanLII 24".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs decidedDate "1978-10-03".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs dissent "Martland J.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs fullCaseName "Arthur Gwyn Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Board of Commissioners of Police".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs heardDate "1978-02-22".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs history "On appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs joindissent "Pigeon, Beetz, Pratte JJ.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs joinmajority "Ritchie, Spence, Dickson, and Estey JJ.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs lawsapplied "155.0".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs majority "Laskin C.J.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs ratio "Holder of a public office is entitled to some degree of procedural fairness and must be treated fairly and not arbitrarily.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs ruling "Appeal allowed".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs scc "1977".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs subject Category:1978_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs subject Category:Canadian_administrative_case_law.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs subject Category:Haldimand_County.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs subject Category:Law_enforcement_in_Canada.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs comment "Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances.".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs label "Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs".
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs sameAs m.02qjzxr.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs sameAs Q17110861.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs sameAs Q17110861.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs wasDerivedFrom Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs?oldid=641867759.
- Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs isPrimaryTopicOf Nicholson_v_Haldimand-Norfolk_Reg_Police_Commrs.