Matches in DBpedia 2015-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc.> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 22 of
22
with 100 triples per page.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. abstract "Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [1992] 3 SCR 120,[1] is a Supreme Court of Canada judgment on trademark law and more specifically the issue of passing off. Ciba-Geigy brought an action against Apotex and Novopharm, alleging that their versions of the prescription drug metoprolol were causing confusion to the public due to their similar appearance to Ciba-Geigy’s version of the drug Lopresor. On appeal to the SCC, the issue was whether a plaintiff is required to establish that the public affected by the risk of confusion includes not only health care professionals but also the patients who consume the drugs in a passing off action involving prescription drugs of a similar appearance. The Supreme Court held affirmatively on this question.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. wikiPageExternalLink 1992canlii33.html.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. wikiPageID "39131343".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. wikiPageRevisionID "593865122".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. caseName "Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. decidedDate "2007-10-29".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. docket "22251".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. fullCaseName "Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. and Novopharm Limited".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. heardDate "2007-01-16".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. history "Judgment against Ciba-Geigy in the Ontario Court of Appeal".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. notparticipating "Stevenson J.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. ruling "Appeal allowed".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. scc "1991".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. unanimous "Gonthier J.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. subject Category:Canadian_trademark_law.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. comment "Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [1992] 3 SCR 120,[1] is a Supreme Court of Canada judgment on trademark law and more specifically the issue of passing off. Ciba-Geigy brought an action against Apotex and Novopharm, alleging that their versions of the prescription drug metoprolol were causing confusion to the public due to their similar appearance to Ciba-Geigy’s version of the drug Lopresor.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. label "Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.".
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. sameAs m.0_fq01d.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. sameAs Q16958340.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. sameAs Q16958340.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. wasDerivedFrom Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc.?oldid=593865122.
- Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc. isPrimaryTopicOf Ciba-Geigy_Canada_Ltd._v._Apotex_Inc..