Matches in DBpedia 2015-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cesan_v_The_Queen> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 triples per page.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen abstract "Cesan v The Queen (2008) 83 ALJR 43 was a decision handed down in the High Court of Australia on 3 September 2008 quashing the convictions of two men for conspiring to import a commercial quantity of narcotics. The Court subsequently delivered reasons for its decision on 6 November 2008.The appellants were convicted in the District Court of New South Wales of conspiring to import a commercial quantity of the drug ecstasy. On appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, it was alleged that the trial judge had been asleep during some parts of the trial when evidence was being given. While the Court of Criminal Appeal found that the judge "was nodding off and on occasion actually asleep from time to time during the trial", it said that this did not necessarily mean that there had been a miscarriage of justice. The Court held (by a 2:1 majority) that "there was no failure of process of such a kind as to make it impossible for the Court to decide that the convictions were just" and accordingly upheld the convictions.The High Court granted the appellants special leave to appeal on 16 May 2008. The appeal was heard before the Full Court on 3 September 2008 which gave orders allowing the appeals, quashing the convictions and remitting the cases for retrials. The Court indicated that it would publish its reasons at a later date.".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen thumbnail Australian_Coat_of_Arms.png?width=300.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen wikiPageExternalLink 273.html.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen wikiPageExternalLink 320.html.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen wikiPageID "19193898".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen wikiPageRevisionID "636402109".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen citations 320.html.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen court High_Court_of_Australia.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen dateDecided "2008-09-03".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen fullName "Cesan v The Queen; Mas Rivadavia v The Queen".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen hasPhotoCollection Cesan_v_The_Queen.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen judges "French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen name "Cesan v The Queen".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen opinions "1".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen opinions "2".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen priorActions "Cesan v Director of Public Prosecutions ; Mas Rivadavia v Director of Public Prosecutions 174 A Crim R 385; [2007] NSWCCA 273".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen subject Category:2008_in_Australian_law.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen subject Category:2008_in_case_law.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen comment "Cesan v The Queen (2008) 83 ALJR 43 was a decision handed down in the High Court of Australia on 3 September 2008 quashing the convictions of two men for conspiring to import a commercial quantity of narcotics. The Court subsequently delivered reasons for its decision on 6 November 2008.The appellants were convicted in the District Court of New South Wales of conspiring to import a commercial quantity of the drug ecstasy.".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen label "Cesan v The Queen".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen sameAs m.04lh6ft.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen sameAs Q5065399.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen sameAs Q5065399.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen wasDerivedFrom Cesan_v_The_Queen?oldid=636402109.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen depiction Australian_Coat_of_Arms.png.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen isPrimaryTopicOf Cesan_v_The_Queen.