Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Memoirs_v._Massachusetts> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 triples per page.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts abstract "Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413 (1966), was the United States Supreme Court decision that attempted to clarify a holding regarding obscenity made a decade earlier in Roth v. United States (1957). Since the Roth ruling, to be declared obscene a work of literature had to be proven by censors to: 1) appeal to prurient interest, 2) be patently offensive, and 3) have no redeeming social value. The book in question in this case was Fanny Hill (or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, 1749) by John Cleland and the Court held in Memoirs v. Massachusetts that, while it might fit the first two criteria (it appealed to prurient interest and was patently offensive), it could not be proven that Fanny Hill had no redeeming social value. The judgment favoring the plaintiff continued that it could still be held obscene under certain circumstances — for instance, if it were marketed solely for its prurient appeal. Memoirs v. Massachusetts led to more years of debate about what was and was not obscene and the conferring of more power in these matters to proposers of local community standards.".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=413.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageID "467690".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageLength "3693".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageOutDegree "17".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageRevisionID "644785978".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Banned_in_Boston.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Category:1966_in_United_States_case_law.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_in_rem_cases.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_obscenity_case_law.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Censorship.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Fanny_Hill.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink John_Cleland.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_383.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Obscenity.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Patently_offensive.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Roth_v._United_States.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Wikt:prurient.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLink Wiktionary:prurient.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLinkText "383 U.S. 413 (1966)".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLinkText "Memoirs v. Massachusetts".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageWikiLinkText "Roth-Jacobellis-Memoirs Test".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts arguedatea "--12-07".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts arguedateb "8".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts argueyear "1965".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts case "Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts citation "172800.0".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts concurrence "Black".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts concurrence "Douglas".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts decidedate "--03-21".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts decideyear "1966".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts dissent "Clark".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts dissent "Harlan".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts dissent "White".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts findlaw getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=413.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts fullname "A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure", et al. v. Attorney General of Massachusetts".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts hasPhotoCollection Memoirs_v._Massachusetts.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts holding "Since the First Amendment forbids censorship of expression of ideas not linked with illegal action, Fanny Hill cannot be proscribed.".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts joinconcurrence "Stewart".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts joinplurality "Warren, Fortas".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts justia case.html.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts litigants "Memoirs v. Massachusetts".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts plurality "Brennan".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts scotus "1965".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts uspage "413".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts usvol "383".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Caselaw_source.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Portal.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Refimprove.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUS-stub.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:US1stAmendment.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Wikisource.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts subject Category:1966_in_United_States_case_law.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts subject Category:United_States_in_rem_cases.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts subject Category:United_States_obscenity_case_law.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type Case.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type LegalCase.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type UnitOfWork.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type Situation.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type Thing.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts type Q2334719.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts comment "Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413 (1966), was the United States Supreme Court decision that attempted to clarify a holding regarding obscenity made a decade earlier in Roth v. United States (1957). Since the Roth ruling, to be declared obscene a work of literature had to be proven by censors to: 1) appeal to prurient interest, 2) be patently offensive, and 3) have no redeeming social value.".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts label "Memoirs v. Massachusetts".
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts sameAs メモワール判決.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts sameAs m.02d16t.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts sameAs Q6815291.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts sameAs Q6815291.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts wasDerivedFrom Memoirs_v._Massachusetts?oldid=644785978.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts isPrimaryTopicOf Memoirs_v._Massachusetts.
- Memoirs_v._Massachusetts name "A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure", et al. v. Attorney General of Massachusetts".