Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { ?s <http://dbpedia.org/property/holding> ?o }
- 1-800_Contacts,_Inc._v._WhenU.com,_Inc. holding "WhenU's actions did not amount to the "use" that the Lanham Act requires in order to constitute trademark infringement. The appeal court reversed the preliminary injunction and ordered the dismissal of all claims made by 1-800 CONTACTS that were based upon trademark infringement, leaving the claims based upon unfair competition and copyright infringement. The case is remanded to the district court.".
- 14_Penn_Plaza_LLC_v._Pyett holding "A provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate ADEA claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law. This CBA clearly and unmistakably requires respondents to arbitrate the age discrimination claims at issue in this appeal. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York reversed.".
- 321_Studios_v._Metro_Goldwyn_Mayer_Studios,_Inc. holding "both of DVD Copy Plus and DVD-X Copy violated the DMCA and that the DMCA was not unconstitutional. 321 Studios was enjoined from manufacturing, distributing, or otherwise trafficking in any type of DVD circumvention software.".
- 44_Liquormart,_Inc._v._Rhode_Island holding "The State of Rhode Island violated the First Amendment rights of the petitioners, and the Twenty-first Amendment does not lessen the state's obligation to abide by constitutional provisions beyond the dormant commerce clause.".
- 62_Cases_of_Jam_v._United_States holding "An imitation jam labeled "imitation" did not violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act's prohibition on "mislabeled" food products.".
- A&M_Records,_Inc._v._Napster,_Inc. holding "Napster could be held liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement, affirming the District Court holding.".
- AT&T_Corp._v._Excel_Communications,_Inc. holding "The claims are eligible for protection by a patent in the United States if it involved some practical application and it produces a useful, concrete and tangible result. The Federal Court reversed the district court's judgment of invalidity and remanded the case for further proceedings.".
- AT&T_Corp._v._Hulteen holding "Maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.".
- AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v._Concepcion holding "The Discover Bank test adopted by California to invalidate certain arbitration agreements with class action waivers is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.".
- Abbate_v._United_States holding "The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not prohibit the prosecution of a conspiracy in federal court under federal law when that same conspiracy has already resulted in a conviction in state court under state law.".
- Abbott_Laboratories_v._Gardner holding "Drug companies were not prohibited by the ripeness doctrine from challenging an FDA regulation requiring a prescription drug's generic name to appear on all related printed materials.".
- Abbott_v._Abbott holding "A parent's ne exeat right is a right to custody under Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act.".
- Abbott_v._United_States holding "A defendant is subject to the highest mandatory minimum specified for his conduct in 18 U.S.C. §924, unless another provision of law directed to conduct proscribed by §924 imposes an even greater mandatory minimum. Third and Fifth Circuits affirmed.".
- Abington_School_District_v._Schempp holding "Sanctioned and organized Bible reading in public schools in the United States is unconstitutional.".
- Ableman_v._Booth holding "A state court cannot grant a writ of habeas corpus to a prisoner arrested under the authority of the United States and in federal custody.".
- Abrams_v._United_States holding "Defendants' criticism of U.S. involvement in World War I was not protected by the First Amendment, because they advocated a strike in munitions production and the violent overthrow of the government.".
- Abuelhawa_v._United_States holding "A person who uses a cell phone to buy drugs solely for personal use cannot be charged with the separate crime of using a phone to facilitate the sale of drugs .".
- Adair_v._United_States holding "Section 10 of the Erdman Act which prohibited railroad companies from demanding that a worker not join a union as a condition for employment was unconstitutional because it infringed on the right to liberty of contract under the Fifth Amendment and exceeded Congress' powers under the Commerce Clause.".
- Adams_v._Tanner holding "The Washington state law that prohibited employment agencies was unconstitutional, because a ban would breach the principle of due process of law in the deprivation of liberty and property.".
- Adams_v._Texas holding "A Texas requirement that jurors swear an oath that the mandatory imposition of a death sentence would not interfere with their consideration of factual matters such as guilt or innocence during a trial is unconstitutional.".
- Adamson_v._California holding "The Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause did not extend to defendants a Fifth Amendment right not to bear witness against themselves in state courts.".
- Adarand_Constructors,_Inc._v._Peña holding "All racial classifications, imposed by whatever federal, state, or local government actor, must be analyzed by a reviewing court under a standard of "strict scrutiny," the highest level of Supreme Court review .".
- Adderley_v._Florida holding "Because a jail facility is not a public forum and a state may regulate the use of its property, the First Amendment rights of the protesters were not violated.".
- Addington_v._Texas holding "That a "clear and convincing" standard of proof is required by the Fourteenth Amendment in a civil proceeding brought under state law to commit an individual involuntarily for an indefinite period to a state mental hospital.".
- Addyston_Pipe_&_Steel_Co._v._United_States holding "Upheld the rule of reason doctrine regarding U.S. antitrust laws.".
- Adickes_v._S.H._Kress_Co. holding "A party moving for summary judgment carries the burden of proof to establish a lack of factual controversy.".
- Adkins_v._Childrens_Hospital holding "Minimum wage law for women violated the due process right to contract freely. D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed.".
- Adobe_Systems,_Inc._v._Southern_Software,_Inc. holding "The court held that Adobe's font program was protectable expression, and Southern Software's font was substantially similar and infringing.".
- Adoptive_Couple_v._Baby_Girl holding "Held that § 1912 does not apply to a parent who has never had custody of the child, that § 1912 only applies when a relationship between parent and child already exists, and that § 1915's preferences do not apply when there are no alternative party seeking to adopt the child.".
- Afroyim_v._Rusk holding "Congress has no power under the Constitution to revoke a person's U.S. citizenship unless he voluntarily relinquishes it. In particular, citizenship may not be revoked as a consequence of voting in a foreign election.".
- Agency_for_International_Development_v._Alliance_for_Open_Society_International,_Inc. holding "The Policy Requirement violates the First Amendment by compelling as a condition of federal funding the affirmation of a belief that by its nature cannot be confined within the scope of the Government program.".
- Agins_v._City_of_Tiburon holding "The California Supreme Court's holding that the zoning ordinances on their face do not take the property without just compensation is upheld.".
- Agostini_v._Felton holding "Reverses Aguilar v. Felton in allowing public school teachers to instruct at religious schools, so long as the material was secular and neutral in nature and no "excessive entanglement" between government and religion was apparent.".
- Aguilar_v._Felton holding "Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 remedial services could not be provided on the premises of a parochial school because doing so violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.".
- Aguilar_v._Texas holding "The magistrate must be informed of some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information and some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded that the informant, whose identity was not disclosed, was credible or his information reliable.".
- Ahlquist_v._Cranston holding "The "School Prayer" banner violates the Establishment Clause".
- Ahrens_v._Clark holding "Unless detained persons are within the territorial jurisdiction of the federal district court they petition, the court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus.".
- Aikens_v._California holding "Since petitioner no longer faces execution, his appeal is moot.".
- Ake_v._Oklahoma holding "An indigent criminal defendant in a murder case where the death penalty could be assessed had a right to have the state provide a psychiatric evaluation to be used in the defendant's behalf.".
- Alabama_v._Bozeman holding "The literal language of Article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars any further criminal proceedings when a defendant is returned to the original place of imprisonment before trial.".
- Alabama_v._Georgia holding "The true border between the states of Alabama and Georgia is the average water mark on the western bank of the Chattahoochee River".
- Alabama_v._Shelton holding "A suspended sentence that may result in incarceration may not be imposed if defendant did not have counsel at trial.".
- Albertson_v._Subversive_Activities_Control_Board holding "Persons believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the SACB because that would violate their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment.".
- Albrecht_v._Herald_Co. holding "Wholesalers cannot require franchisees and retailers of their products to sell items at a certain price.".
- Alden_v._Maine holding "Article I of the United States Constitution does not provide Congress with the ability to subject nonconsenting states to private suits for damages in its own courts.".
- Alderson_v._Commissioner holding "The exchange of property constituted a taxable exchange, reversing the Tax Court ruling".
- Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education holding "The still segregated southern schools must desegregate immediately.".
- Alexander_v._Sandoval holding "There is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.".
- Ali_v._Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons holding "The United States cannot be sued for failing to return property when the loss is caused by any law enforcement officer.".
- Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_Intl holding "Merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform an abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.".
- Allen_v._United_States_(1896) holding "There is no error in a jury instruction encouraging dissenting jurors to reconsider".
- Allen_v._Wright holding "Parties lack standing to sue where the policies of a government agency are alleged to be insufficient to prevent school segregation.".
- Alleyne_v._United_States holding "Because mandatory minimum sentences increase the penalty for a crime, any fact that increases the mandatory minimum is an “element” of the crime that must be submitted to the jury.".
- Allgeyer_v._Louisiana holding "1".
- Allgeyer_v._Louisiana holding "2".
- Allison_Engine_Co._v._United_States_ex_rel._Sanders holding "Plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must demonstrate that the defendants intended to deceive the government, not simply that government money was used to pay the claim. Decision of the appeals court vacated and case remanded.".
- Almeida-Sanchez_v._United_States holding "Searches of automobiles must still have probable cause even in the absence of a warrant.".
- Almendarez-Torres_v._United_States holding "The fact of a defendant's prior convictions is not subject to the jury-trial requirement of the Sixth Amendment.".
- Altria_Group,_Inc._v._Good holding "Federal law does not preempt the application of state law prohibiting deceptive practices in advertising to the advertisement of tar and nicotine rates in cigarettes. First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.".
- Altvater_v._Freeman holding "Although a licensee had maintained payments of royalties, a Declaratory Judgment Act claim of invalidity of the licensed patent still presented a justiciable case or controversy.".
- Alvarez_v._Smith holding "Case dismissed as moot, judgement of the Seventh Circuit vacated".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization holding "The court confirmed that an initiative may not "revise" California's constitution; however, the Prop 13 did not amount to a revision but an amendment.".
- Amaretto_Ranch_Breedables,_LLC_v._Ozimals,_Inc. holding "Motion for Temporary Restraining Order GRANTED in favor of Amaretto".
- America_Online,_Inc._v._IMS holding "The undisputed facts indicated that defendant committed a trespass to chattels against AOL's computer network, falsely designated the origin of his products and diluted AOL's trademark and service mark in violation of the Lanham Act. Therefore, summary judgment was granted.".
- American_Automobile_Assn_v._United_States holding "The Commissioner of Internal Revenue did not abuse his discretion in determining that the prepaid dues were taxable as income in the year in which they were actually received and in rejecting the taxpayer's method of accounting.".
- American_Broadcasting_Cos._v._Aereo,_Inc. holding "Aereo's retransmission of television broadcasts was a "public performance" of the networks' copyrighted work. The Copyright Act of 1976 forbids such performances without the permission of the holder of the copyright. Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.".
- American_Civil_Liberties_Union_v._National_Security_Agency holding "ACLU did not have standing to bring the suit against the NSA, because plaintiffs could not present evidence that they were the targets of the "Terrorist Surveillance Program".".
- American_Communications_Assn_v._Douds holding "Taft–Hartley Act's anti-communist oath does not violate the First Amendment, Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, or Article VI of the Constitution.".
- American_Family_Assn_v._City_and_County_of_San_Francisco holding "Plaintiff's Establishment Clause claim was dismissed because Defendants' actions had a secular purpose, did not primary effect on inhibiting religion, and did not create excessive entanglement with religion. Plaintiff's free exercise claim was dismissed because Defendants' actions were neither regulatory nor proscriptive. Plaintiffs' hybrid free exercise/free speech claim was dismissed because Defendants' did not sanction or threaten to sanction Plaintiff's speech.".
- American_Fur_Co._v._United_States holding "Held that the agent's acts and statements bound the principal; that all goods were subject to seizure and forfeiture; but that the instructions on where in Indian territory the seizure could be made was in error to the point that a new trial was required.".
- American_Mining_Congress_v._Mine_Safety_&_Health_Administration holding "The Program Policy letters of the mine Safety and Health Administration which stated the agency's position that certain X - Ray readings were qualified as diagnoses of lung diseases within the meaning of agency regulations were interpretive rules under the Administrative Procedure Act.".
- American_Needle,_Inc._v._National_Football_League holding "The National Football League's licensing of intellectual property in this case constitutes concerted action that is not categorically beyond Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act's coverage. The judgment of the Seventh Circuit is reversed.".
- American_Society_of_Mechanical_Engineers,_Inc._v._Hydrolevel_Corp. holding "A non-profit association, for the first time, was held liable for treble damages under the Sherman Antitrust Act due to antitrust violations.".
- American_Well_Works_Co._v._Layne_&_Bowler_Co. holding "Where one party wrongs another by making statements to the effect that an article sold by the latter infringes the former's patent, this is a question of state law and not federal patent law, and therefore §1331 grants no jurisdiction to federal district courts.".
- Anders_v._California holding "The failure to grant this indigent petitioner seeking initial review of his conviction the services of an advocate, as contrasted with an amicus curiae, which would have been available to an appellant with financial means, violated petitioner's rights to fair procedure and equality under the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Andersen_v._King_County holding "Washington's Defense of Marriage Act denying same-sex couples marriage licenses does not violate the due process clause, privilege and immunity clause, or the Equal Rights Amendment of the Washington State Constitution.".
- Anderson_v._Celebrezze holding "Ohio's early filing deadline places an unconstitutional burden on the voting and associational rights of petitioner Anderson's supporters.".
- Anderson_v._Liberty_Lobby,_Inc. holding "The Court laid out the standard for a trial court to grant summary judgment.".
- Anderson_v._Mt._Clemens_Pottery_Co. holding "Preliminary work activities, where controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included in the statutory workweek under Fair Labor Standards Act.".
- Andersons-Black_Rock,_Inc._v._Pavement_Salvage_Co. holding "When old elements are combined in a way such that they do not interact in a novel, unobvious way, then the resulting combination is obvious and therefore unpatentable.".
- Andresen_v._Maryland holding "The searches and seizures were not "unreasonable" in violation of the Fourth Amendment.".
- Antoine_v._Washington holding "That treaties and laws must be construed in favor of Native Americans ; that the Supremacy Clause precludes the application of state game laws to the tribe; that Congress showed no intent to subject the tribe to state jurisdiction for hunting; and while the state can regulate non-Indians in the ceded area, Indians must be exempted from such regulations.".
- Anza_v._Ideal_Steel_Supply_Corp. holding "The plaintiff lacks standing because it was not directly injured by the defendant.".
- Apodaca_v._Oregon holding "There is no constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict in criminal cases. Thus Oregon's law did not violate due process.".
- Apple_Computer,_Inc._v._Franklin_Computer_Corp. holding "Computer software could be protected by copyright. District Court reversed and remanded.".
- Apple_v._Does holding "Trial court reversed; motion for a protective order must be granted".
- Apprendi_v._New_Jersey holding "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, every fact necessary to authorize a defendant's punishment must be either admitted by the defendant or found by a jury on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The New Jersey Hate Crime Statute was an unconstitutional violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial because it allowed a judge to increase a criminal sentence beyond its statutory maximum based on his own finding of an aggravating factor by the preponderance of the evidence. New Jersey Supreme Court reversed and remanded.".
- Aptheker_v._Secretary_of_State holding "§ 6 of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950 is an unconstitutional abridgment of a person's freedom of movement and is impermissibly broad.".
- Arbaugh_v._Y_&_H_Corp. holding "The numerical threshold in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which limits actions to those against employers with fifteen or more employees, is not a jurisdictional requirement, but is instead a substantive requirement of a claim that a defendant cannot raise after the close of trial. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.".
- Argersinger_v._Hamlin holding "A criminal defendant may not be actually imprisoned unless provided with counsel".
- Arista_Records,_LLC_v._Launch_Media,_Inc holding "Affirmed. In favor of Defendant-Appellee Launch Media, Inc.".
- Arista_Records_LLC_v._Lime_Group_LLC holding "Summary judgment granted for inducement of copyright infringement".
- Arizona_Christian_School_Tuition_Organization_v._Winn holding "Taxpayers lack standing under Article III because they are challenging a tax credit, rather than government spending. 9th Circuit Reversed".
- Arizona_Public_Service_Co._v._Snead holding "New Mexico energy tax on the generation of electricity is invalid under the Supremacy Clause.".
- Arizona_State_Legislature_v._Arizona_Independent_Redistricting_Commission holding "Petitioners have standing; The Elections Clause of the United States Constitution and 2 U.S.C. §2a permit Arizona’s use of a commission to adopt congressional districts.".
- Arizona_v._Evans holding "The exclusionary rule does not apply when an error in a warrant, or the misrepresented existence of a warrant, occurs due to the actions of personnel not enforcing the law, such as Court Clerks.".
- Arizona_v._Fulminante holding "The harmless error rule is applicable to the admission of involuntary confessions. Violations of this rule are grounds for granting the defendant a new trial.".
- Arizona_v._Gant holding "1".
- Arizona_v._Gant holding "2".
- Arizona_v._Hicks holding "Police require probable cause to seize items in plain view.".