Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q892484> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 triples per page.
- Q892484 subject Q16817232.
- Q892484 subject Q6969546.
- Q892484 abstract "The definition of a direct–inverse language is a matter under research, but it is widely understood to involve different grammar for transitive predications according to the relative positions of their "subject" and their "object" on a person hierarchy, which in turn is some combination of saliency and animacy specific to a given language. The direct construction is the unmarked one. The direct construction is used when the subject of the transitive clause outranks the object in the person hierarchy, and the inverse is used when the object outranks the subject. The existence of direct–inverse morphosyntax is usually accompanied by proximate–obviative morphosyntax. The direct–inverse dimension subsumes the proximate–obviative dimension. Crosslinguistically, obviation almost always involves the third person (second person obviation is reported for some Nilo-Saharan languages), and the direct–inverse alternation is usually presented as being one way of marking the proximate–obviative distinction between two (or more) third person arguments of a sentence. However, there are at least two languages with inverse systems, the Mesoamerican languages Zoque and Huastec, where inverse morphosyntax is never used when both subject and object are third person, but only when one of these arguments is third person and the other is a speech act participant (SAP), i.e., first person or second person.".
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink The_inverse_in_Japhug_Rgyalrong.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink Direct-Inverse_systems.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink LECT7-8.htm.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink WAIL2004_Zavala.pdf.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink navajo.rtf.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink 100.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink oj_verbs.html.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink Bisang5.PDF.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink RudeTransitivityInSahaptin.html.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink Bliss.pdf.
- Q892484 wikiPageExternalLink klaiman93inverse.pdf.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q1250335.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q128234.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q13310.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q1536018.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q164573.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q1659701.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q16817232.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q175026.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q1774805.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q1897166.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q2328313.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q27475.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q28304.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q33090.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q33170.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q33392.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q3348541.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q33730.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q33875.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q35573.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q35787.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q3833015.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q5908687.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q6553970.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q6969546.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q7404470.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q832026.
- Q892484 wikiPageWikiLink Q954016.
- Q892484 comment "The definition of a direct–inverse language is a matter under research, but it is widely understood to involve different grammar for transitive predications according to the relative positions of their "subject" and their "object" on a person hierarchy, which in turn is some combination of saliency and animacy specific to a given language. The direct construction is the unmarked one.".
- Q892484 label "Direct–inverse language".