Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7457121> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7457121 subject Q6996274.
- Q7457121 subject Q6999030.
- Q7457121 subject Q8202518.
- Q7457121 subject Q8700471.
- Q7457121 abstract "Template:Infobox court caseSevcik v. Sandoval is the lead case that successfully challenged the Nevada's denial of same-sex marriage as prohibited by that state's constitution and statutory law. The plaintiffs' complaint was initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on April 10, 2012, on behalf of several couples denied marriage licenses. These couples challenged the denial on the basis of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection. On November 26, 2012, Chief District Judge Robert C. Jones ruled against the plaintiff same-sex couples, granting in part a motion to dismiss the complaint against the Nevada government officials named in it. The plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 3, 2012.A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments in Sevcik and two related cases, Jackson v. Abercrombie and Latta v. Otter, on September 8, 2014. On October 7, the panel reversed the lower court's ruling in Sevcik, remanding the case back to district court with direction to enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. This effectively legalized same-sex marriage in Nevada. After at least one judge on Court of Appeals asked for a vote on the defendants' petition to have the case reheard by a larger, 11-judge panel, no majority of judges on the Ninth Circuit would agree; thus the rehearing was denied on January 9, 2015.".
- Q7457121 thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg?width=300.
- Q7457121 wikiPageExternalLink 12-17668%20opinion.pdf.
- Q7457121 wikiPageExternalLink sevcik_nv_20120410_complaint-for-declaratory-and-injunctive-relief_0.pdf.
- Q7457121 wikiPageExternalLink 2-12-cv-00578-68.
- Q7457121 wikiPageExternalLink 2-12-cv-00578-86.
- Q7457121 wikiPageExternalLink Sevcik-v-Sandoval-Ruling.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q1087840.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q1137223.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q1157002.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q1227.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q12809489.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q16106334.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q1643587.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q17307850.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q17422.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q17476.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q17884.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q17888.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q18354032.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q3441204.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q468489.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q4849241.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q4869642.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5041824.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5052604.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5065278.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5164212.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5271932.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5375046.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5757227.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q5881466.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6047385.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6266040.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6458102.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6773396.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6917734.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996274.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999030.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7003477.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q714516.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7295753.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7302627.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7302639.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7342987.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7365076.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7610345.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7766927.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889781.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893525.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q8202518.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q836925.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q8445.
- Q7457121 wikiPageWikiLink Q8700471.
- Q7457121 comment "Template:Infobox court caseSevcik v. Sandoval is the lead case that successfully challenged the Nevada's denial of same-sex marriage as prohibited by that state's constitution and statutory law. The plaintiffs' complaint was initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on April 10, 2012, on behalf of several couples denied marriage licenses. These couples challenged the denial on the basis of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection.".
- Q7457121 label "Sevcik v. Sandoval".
- Q7457121 depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg.