Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7357468> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 100 of
100
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7357468 subject Q6996306.
- Q7357468 subject Q6996385.
- Q7357468 subject Q6996392.
- Q7357468 subject Q6997526.
- Q7357468 subject Q6997928.
- Q7357468 subject Q6997967.
- Q7357468 subject Q6998927.
- Q7357468 subject Q8243342.
- Q7357468 abstract "Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the arbitration of securities fraud claims. It was originally brought by a group of Texas investors against their brokerage house. By a 5–4 margin the Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and ruled that their claims under the Securities Act of 1933, which regulates trading in the primary market, must be arbitrated as stipulated in their customer agreements.The decision overruled a 1953 case, Wilko v. Swan. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion found that arbitration procedures offered more adequate protection for investors than they had when that case was decided. John Paul Stevens's short dissent criticized the majority for taking it upon itself to overturn a precedent that, he argued, Congress had purposely left intact during a major overhaul of the securities laws in the mid-1970s. Both criticized the Fifth Circuit for having overruled Wilko before the Court itself did, reminding lower courts that only the Supreme Court could overrule itself, an aspect of the decision that has come in for some criticism.Many courts besides the Fifth Circuit had chosen to disregard Wilko after the Supreme Court's own decision in Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon that claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which applies to the secondary market, were also arbitrable if a contract so provided cast serious doubt on the logic of the older case. As a result of Rodriguez de Quijas, many more securities fraud claims were heard in arbitration instead of the courts, an intended outcome that has supporters and critics and led to long-term changes in how the securities industry conducts arbitration. The decision was the last in the Mitsubishi trilogy, which expanded the use of arbitration from contractual disputes to statutory claims during the 1980s.".
- Q7357468 wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=490&invol=477.
- Q7357468 wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=4986456804213944237.
- Q7357468 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q7357468 wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Q7357468 wikiPageExternalLink opinion.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1089933.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1092720.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q11109.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q11132.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q11171.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q11991268.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q12058774.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q12186539.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1323255.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1330176.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1349203.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1359993.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1425088.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1509347.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1626038.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q16557.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q17110160.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q1999032.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q206937.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q2073644.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q250451.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q250456.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q312348.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q34582.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q3577283.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4388685.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4570975.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q46350.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4742998.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4784729.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4784730.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q4849238.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q486901.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q51693.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5282696.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q536390.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5375046.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440012.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5493918.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5608642.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q5879700.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6023633.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6183055.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6518439.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602563.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602710.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q665141.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6694579.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6738447.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6883100.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q696606.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996392.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997526.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997928.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997967.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998927.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q702345.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7099379.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q717401.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7312196.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7492210.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q779439.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889844.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7895892.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q7945506.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q8002561.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q8243342.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q875738.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q898871.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q953944.
- Q7357468 wikiPageWikiLink Q994506.
- Q7357468 fullname "Opelia Rodriguez de Quijas, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., and Jon Grady Deaton, Defendants-Appellants. Mary Grace Norman, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Adelina Trapero, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns, and Jon Grady Deaton, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellants. Gene Griffin and Gertrud Griffin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc, f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.".
- Q7357468 type Case.
- Q7357468 type LegalCase.
- Q7357468 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7357468 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7357468 type Situation.
- Q7357468 type Thing.
- Q7357468 type Q2334719.
- Q7357468 comment "Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the arbitration of securities fraud claims. It was originally brought by a group of Texas investors against their brokerage house.".
- Q7357468 label "Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express Inc.".
- Q7357468 name "Opelia Rodriguez de Quijas, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., and Jon Grady Deaton, Defendants-Appellants. Mary Grace Norman, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Adelina Trapero, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc., f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns, and Jon Grady Deaton, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellants. Gene Griffin and Gertrud Griffin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Shearson/Lehman Brothers Inc, f/k/a Shearson/American Express, Inc., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.".