Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7092337> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 15 of
15
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7092337 subject Q6180719.
- Q7092337 subject Q6985940.
- Q7092337 abstract "A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted.Peter Suber has written: "The one-sidedness fallacy does not make an argument invalid. It may not even make the argument unsound. The fallacy consists in persuading readers, and perhaps ourselves, that we have said enough to tilt the scale of evidence and therefore enough to justify a judgment. If we have been one-sided, though, then we haven't yet said enough to justify a judgment. The arguments on the other side may be stronger than our own. We won't know until we examine them. So the one-sidedness fallacy doesn't mean that your premises are false or irrelevant, only that they are incomplete.""With rational messages, you need to decide if you want to use a one-sided argument or a two-sided argument. A one-sided argument only presents the pro side of the argument, while a two-sided argument presents both sides. Which one you use will depend on which one meets your needs and the type of audience. Generally, one-sided arguments are better with audiences already favorable to your message. Two-sided arguments are best with audiences who are opposed to your argument, are better educated or have already been exposed to counter arguments."".
- Q7092337 wikiPageExternalLink onesided.htm.
- Q7092337 wikiPageExternalLink 6547.
- Q7092337 wikiPageExternalLink 33710086.html.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q3006765.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q3312438.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q3555058.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q431498.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q4822211.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q6180719.
- Q7092337 wikiPageWikiLink Q6985940.
- Q7092337 comment "A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted.Peter Suber has written: "The one-sidedness fallacy does not make an argument invalid. It may not even make the argument unsound.".
- Q7092337 label "One-sided argument".