Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6683740> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6683740 subject Q8819523.
- Q6683740 abstract "Loss of consortium is a term used in the law of torts that refers to the deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries caused by a tortfeasor. Loss of consortium arising from personal injuries was recognized under the English common law. For example in Baker v Bolton, (1808) 1 Camp 493, a man was permitted to recover for his loss of consortium while his wife languished after a carriage accident. However, once she died from her injuries, his right to recover for lost consortium ended. After the enactment of the Lord Campbell's Act (9 and 10 Vic. c. 93) the English common law continued to prohibit recovery for loss of consortium resulting from the death of a victim. The availability of loss of consortium differs drastically among common law jurisdictions and does not exist at all in several of them. Damages for loss of consortium are considered separately from, and are not to be confused with compensatory damages.The action was originally paired in a Latin expression: "per quod servitium et consortium amisit," translated as "in consequence of which he lost her society and services." The relationship between husband and wife has, historically, been considered worthy of legal protection. The interest being protected under consortium, is that which the head of the household (father or husband) had in the physical integrity of his wife, children, or servants. The undertone of this action is that the husband had an unreciprocated proprietary interest in his wife. The deprivations identified include the economic contributions of the injured spouse to the household, care and affection, and sex. The action originated in the 18th century and was once available to a father against a man who was courting his daughter outside of marriage, on the grounds that the father had lost the consortium of his daughter's household services because she was spending time with her beau.Loss of consortium has been brought into the law as a cause of action by civil codes, for example, in Maine or into the common law by action of justices. Other jurisdictions view loss of consortium as an element of damages, not as an independent cause of action; in which case the claim must be brought under another tort. As an example, in suits brought under the State of Washington's wrongful death statute, loss of consortium is an element of damages. While some jurisdictions only recognize spousal consortium (usually considered as sex) others recognize parental consortium (love and affection) as well allowing children to recover for the death or disability of a parent and vice versa.Since same-sex marriage became available in the United States, courts in that country have extended loss of consortium to these unions.".
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q1223.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q154136.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q158970.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q1768566.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q1923776.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q194166.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q20857981.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q308922.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q471855.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q5437273.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q724.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q7748.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q8038640.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q8436.
- Q6683740 wikiPageWikiLink Q8819523.
- Q6683740 comment "Loss of consortium is a term used in the law of torts that refers to the deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries caused by a tortfeasor. Loss of consortium arising from personal injuries was recognized under the English common law. For example in Baker v Bolton, (1808) 1 Camp 493, a man was permitted to recover for his loss of consortium while his wife languished after a carriage accident.".
- Q6683740 label "Loss of consortium".