Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6646506> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6646506 subject Q6995634.
- Q6646506 subject Q6995668.
- Q6646506 subject Q6996184.
- Q6646506 subject Q8185006.
- Q6646506 abstract "REDIRECT Template:Infobox court caseLister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22 is an English tort law case, creating a new precedent for finding where an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of their employees. Prior to this decision, it had been found that sexual abuse by employees of others could not be seen as in the course of their employment, precluding recovery from the employer. The majority of the House of Lords however overruled the Court of Appeal, and these earlier decisions, establishing that the "relative closeness" connecting the tort and the nature of an individual's employment established liability.".
- Q6646506 wikiPageExternalLink 22.html.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q10860242.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q11007.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q1537073.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q1579315.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q158970.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q1680173.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q170028.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q217595.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q2727213.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q326779.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q43414.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q4875217.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q4959031.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q5310501.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q58900.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q622425.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q6256532.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q656365.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q665141.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q6791837.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q6995634.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q6995668.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996184.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q7924976.
- Q6646506 wikiPageWikiLink Q8185006.
- Q6646506 comment "REDIRECT Template:Infobox court caseLister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22 is an English tort law case, creating a new precedent for finding where an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of their employees. Prior to this decision, it had been found that sexual abuse by employees of others could not be seen as in the course of their employment, precluding recovery from the employer.".
- Q6646506 label "Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd".