Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6268504> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6268504 subject Q6996306.
- Q6268504 subject Q6998510.
- Q6268504 subject Q8124793.
- Q6268504 subject Q8782018.
- Q6268504 abstract "Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co., 196 U.S. 1 (1904) was a case before the United States Supreme Court. It interpreted the words "any car" in the Railroad Safety Appliance Act prohibiting common carriers from using any car in moving interstate commerce not equipped with automatic couplers. In doing so, it overturned the Eighth Circuit in Johnson v. Southern P. Co., 117 F. 462 (8th Cir. 1902)".
- Q6268504 wikiPageExternalLink books?id=AY89AAAAIAAJ&lpg=RA1-PA132&ots=4pE_42WEPA&dq=Johnson%20v.%20Southern%20Pacific%20Co.%20Act%20car%20coupler&pg=RA1-PA131.
- Q6268504 wikiPageExternalLink 1.html.
- Q6268504 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q1473764.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602192.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998510.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q7419323.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q7570277.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q758662.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q8124793.
- Q6268504 wikiPageWikiLink Q8782018.
- Q6268504 fullname "Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.".
- Q6268504 type Case.
- Q6268504 type LegalCase.
- Q6268504 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q6268504 type UnitOfWork.
- Q6268504 type Situation.
- Q6268504 type Thing.
- Q6268504 type Q2334719.
- Q6268504 comment "Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co., 196 U.S. 1 (1904) was a case before the United States Supreme Court. It interpreted the words "any car" in the Railroad Safety Appliance Act prohibiting common carriers from using any car in moving interstate commerce not equipped with automatic couplers. In doing so, it overturned the Eighth Circuit in Johnson v. Southern P. Co., 117 F. 462 (8th Cir. 1902)".
- Q6268504 label "Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.".
- Q6268504 name "Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.".