Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5941246> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5941246 subject Q6996306.
- Q5941246 subject Q6996738.
- Q5941246 subject Q6996744.
- Q5941246 subject Q6997934.
- Q5941246 subject Q6998653.
- Q5941246 abstract "Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case decided during the Franklin Delano Roosevelt presidency, regarding the powers that a President of the United States has to remove certain executive officials of a "quasi-legislative," "quasi-judicial" administrative body created by Congress, for purely political reasons and without the consent of Congress.Roosevelt was dissatisfied with William Humphrey, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, as Humphrey did not, in Roosevelt's view, support his New Deal policies vigorously enough.Twice, Roosevelt requested Humphrey to resign from the FTC, requests to which Humphrey did not yield. The third time, Roosevelt fired Humphrey: "Effective as of this date you are hereby removed from the office of Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission." Nevertheless, Humphrey continued to come to work at the FTC even after he was formally fired. However, the Federal Trade Commission Act permitted the President to dismiss an FTC member only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." Roosevelt's decision to dismiss Humphrey was based solely on political differences rather than job performance or alleged acts of malfeasance.The case went to the Supreme Court, but Humphrey died before the case could be decided. The case was then pursued by the executors of his estate; thus, the case obtained the title "Humphrey's Executor".The Court distinguished between executive officers and quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial officers. The latter may be removed only with procedures consistent with statutory conditions enacted by Congress; the former serve at the pleasure of the President and may be removed at his discretion. The Court ruled that the Federal Trade Commission was a quasi-legislative body because of other powers it had and so the President could not fire an FTC member solely for political reasons; thus, Humphrey's firing was improper.U.S. Attorney General Robert H. Jackson, later to join the Supreme Court himself, said in his memoirs that Roosevelt was particularly annoyed by the Court's decision, as the President felt that it had been rendered for spite.".
- Q5941246 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q5941246 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q5941246 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q5941246 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q5941246 wikiPageExternalLink USSC_CR_0295_0602_ZO.html.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q11696.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q1794711.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q186356.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q2186896.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q48416.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q48423.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q505450.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440467.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q636207.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6517400.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q654437.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602318.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996738.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996744.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997934.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998653.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q786713.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q8007.
- Q5941246 wikiPageWikiLink Q845768.
- Q5941246 fullname "Humphrey's Executor v. United States. Rathbun v. Same".
- Q5941246 type Case.
- Q5941246 type LegalCase.
- Q5941246 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q5941246 type UnitOfWork.
- Q5941246 type Situation.
- Q5941246 type Thing.
- Q5941246 type Q2334719.
- Q5941246 comment "Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S.".
- Q5941246 label "Humphrey's Executor v. United States".
- Q5941246 name "Humphrey's Executor v. United States. Rathbun v. Same".