Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5883663> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5883663 subject Q6996306.
- Q5883663 subject Q6996388.
- Q5883663 subject Q6997067.
- Q5883663 subject Q6998999.
- Q5883663 subject Q8586753.
- Q5883663 abstract "Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime. The Court vacated the rape and murder conviction in South Carolina of a man who had been denied the opportunity to present evidence of a third party's guilt, because the trial court believed the prosecutor's forensic evidence was too strong for the defendant's evidence to raise an inference of innocence. The Court ruled unanimously that this exclusion violated the right of a defendant to have a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense, because the strength of a prosecutor's case had no logical relationship to whether a defendant's evidence was too weak to be admissible.The opinion was delivered by Justice Samuel Alito, and was his first opinion as a member of the Court following his confirmation on January 31, 2006. This follows a Supreme Court tradition that the first written opinion of a new justice reflect a unanimous decision. Also, this case had marked the last time in ten years that Clarence Thomas had asked a question during oral argument. This period of silence would last until shortly after the death of Antonin Scalia, with the oral argument during Voisine v. United States.".
- Q5883663 wikiPageExternalLink 2021.
- Q5883663 wikiPageExternalLink 04-1327.pdf.
- Q5883663 wikiPageExternalLink 04-1327.pdf.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q11138.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q11142.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q11144.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q11156.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q1456.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q159394.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q176763.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q2314618.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q246624.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q35657.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q384754.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q465363.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q468947.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q48525.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q5157242.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q5172677.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q5312127.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q545861.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q5978094.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q600751.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q663272.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996388.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997067.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998999.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7099379.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7310970.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7311531.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7410750.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7430.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7566562.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7566647.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q7567159.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q837675.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q8454.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586753.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q898871.
- Q5883663 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q5883663 fullname "Bobby Lee Holmes v. South Carolina".
- Q5883663 type Case.
- Q5883663 type LegalCase.
- Q5883663 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q5883663 type UnitOfWork.
- Q5883663 type Situation.
- Q5883663 type Thing.
- Q5883663 type Q2334719.
- Q5883663 comment "Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime.".
- Q5883663 label "Holmes v. South Carolina".
- Q5883663 name "Bobby Lee Holmes v. South Carolina".