Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5610612> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 21 of
21
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5610612 subject Q6996274.
- Q5610612 subject Q6996499.
- Q5610612 subject Q6997013.
- Q5610612 subject Q6998990.
- Q5610612 abstract "Grosso v. Miramax, 383 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2004), was an entertainment law case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a screenwriter's claim for breach of implied contract was not preempted by United States federal copyright law, because the screenwriter's claim alleged an extra element that transformed the action from one arising under the ambit of the federal copyright statute to one sounding in contract.".
- Q5610612 thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg?width=300.
- Q5610612 wikiPageExternalLink B193872.PDF.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q1641851.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440550.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q6805836.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996274.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996499.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997013.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998990.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q79756.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q832728.
- Q5610612 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q5610612 comment "Grosso v. Miramax, 383 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2004), was an entertainment law case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a screenwriter's claim for breach of implied contract was not preempted by United States federal copyright law, because the screenwriter's claim alleged an extra element that transformed the action from one arising under the ambit of the federal copyright statute to one sounding in contract.".
- Q5610612 label "Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp.".
- Q5610612 depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg.