Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q22022311> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 triples per page.
- Q22022311 subject Q22032019.
- Q22022311 subject Q6996306.
- Q22022311 subject Q6996388.
- Q22022311 abstract "Davis v. Ayala, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a death sentence of a Hispanic defendant despite the fact that all Blacks and Hispanics were excluded from the jury during the defendant's trial. The case involved a habeas corpus petition submitted by Hector Ayala, who was arrested and tried in the late 1980s for the alleged murder of three individuals during an attempted robbery of an automobile body shop in San Diego, California in April 1985. At trial, the prosecution used peremptory challenges to strike all Black and Hispanic jurors who were available for jury service. The trial court judge allowed the prosecution to explain the basis for the peremptory challenges outside the presence of Ayala's counsel, "so as not to disclose trial strategy". Ayala was ultimately sentenced to death, but he filed several appeals challenging the constitutionality of the trial court's decision to exclude his counsel from the hearings.In a 5–4 opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court held that even if the trial court committed error, the error was harmless and that Ayala did not suffer any actual prejudice. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion in which she argued that Ayala's sentence should be reversed because the exclusion of Ayala's counsel from the hearings "substantially influenced the outcome" of the case. Additionally, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a separate concurring opinion in which he questioned the propriety of Ayala's placement in solitary confinement. In response, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a one-paragraph concurring opinion in which he stated that Ayala's accommodations were "far sight more spacious than those in which his victims ... now rest".Commentators have described the case as "important" and note that will likely have a "significant effect" on similar cases in the future. However, some analysts have described the outcome as "particularly unjust". Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion also received significant coverage from the media, and some analysts suggested that solitary confinement may become a "new battleground" for Justice Kennedy. One commentator described Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion as "the single most surprising and heartening development of the term".".
- Q22022311 wikiPageExternalLink 13-1428.html.
- Q22022311 wikiPageExternalLink 13-1428.
- Q22022311 wikiPageExternalLink 13-1428.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q1068288.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11105.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11107.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11116.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11124.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11138.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11142.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11144.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11171.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q1323255.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q132627.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q1614849.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q16552.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q188515.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q194907.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q21068147.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q217305.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q217528.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q22032019.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q220596.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q2629503.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q2864336.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q3308934.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q4775331.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q4869642.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q49122.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q5208902.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q522066.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q5636669.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q5636685.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602066.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602711.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q6777470.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996388.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q7167841.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q7311531.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q7598368.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q7603706.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q8454.
- Q22022311 wikiPageWikiLink Q991.
- Q22022311 fullname "RON DAVIS, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. HECTOR AYALA".
- Q22022311 type Case.
- Q22022311 type LegalCase.
- Q22022311 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q22022311 type UnitOfWork.
- Q22022311 type Situation.
- Q22022311 type Thing.
- Q22022311 type Q2334719.
- Q22022311 comment "Davis v. Ayala, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a death sentence of a Hispanic defendant despite the fact that all Blacks and Hispanics were excluded from the jury during the defendant's trial.".
- Q22022311 label "Davis v. Ayala".
- Q22022311 name "RON DAVIS, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. HECTOR AYALA".