Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q19881047> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 triples per page.
- Q19881047 subject Q15243881.
- Q19881047 subject Q6996300.
- Q19881047 subject Q6999026.
- Q19881047 subject Q7583750.
- Q19881047 subject Q7637894.
- Q19881047 abstract "FTC v. Balls of Kryptonite is an enforcement action brought in 2009 by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in United States District Court for the Central District of California. The defendant was Jaivin Karnani, a Southern California man, his company Balls of Kryptonite LLC, and several other corporate names they did business as. In 2011 the FTC secured a court order barring Karnani and Balls of Kryptonite from engaging in many of the deceptive business practices that had brought him to the agency's attention.For several years before the FTC brought its case, Karnani had been selling consumer electronic devices such as cameras, video game systems and computer software to customers in the United Kingdom. Despite being physically located in California, he registered his websites in British domains, quoted prices in pounds sterling and took other steps to suggest that the business was physically located in the U.K. Customers who bought the merchandise at the prices quoted, usually significantly lower than other, established British retailers, found that delivery took in some cases far longer than the promised 48 hours even though their credit cards were charged immediately and they were told they could not cancel their orders. In many cases, the goods they received were inoperable since they had never been intended for sale in the British or European markets, and were thus not protected by warranty.Complaints to the U.K.'s Office of Fair Trading (OFT) led to the FTC's enforcement action. In response to its initial complaint Judge Dean D. Pregerson issued a temporary restraining order barring Karnani and his companies from misrepresenting their location on their websites along with the other practices customers had complained to OFT about. It was the first time the FTC had brought an action against an American company that did business exclusively abroad, its first action enforcing the U.S./EU Safe Harbor Privacy Program and one of the first uses of its expanded ability to coordinate its efforts with foreign counterparts under the SAFE WEB Act Congress had passed several years earlier.The FTC's decision to pursue the case came in for some criticism. Some commentators, who thought the case title was humorous enough to make extended references to the Superman comics in their commentary, questioned whether the commission's action against a retailer who did not deceive any American consumers was a wise use of its limited resources, and whether it might have been better to prosecute him in Britain. Another, in the course of criticizing the failings of the European Union's Data Protection Directive when it came to dealing with cloud computing, did not criticize the enforcement action as such but showed that it pointed out how much more work needed to be done in ensuring compliance with the Safe Harbor Program.".
- Q19881047 thumbnail CD_CA_seal.jpg?width=300.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1044785.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1146710.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1301500.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1308200.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q14296.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q145.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1469546.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1474926.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q149789.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q15243881.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q166559.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q1973354.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q2094110.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q229851.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q242.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q25224.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q32635.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q329717.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q3307525.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q37913.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q379330.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q421669.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q4273837.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q458.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q4794927.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q483639.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q485176.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q5162854.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q5164672.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q5246109.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q53247.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q581105.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q6495575.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q696617.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996300.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999026.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q7079218.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q7583750.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q7637894.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q786713.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889764.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q79015.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q79738.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q844837.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q845922.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q911488.
- Q19881047 wikiPageWikiLink Q944728.
- Q19881047 comment "FTC v. Balls of Kryptonite is an enforcement action brought in 2009 by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in United States District Court for the Central District of California. The defendant was Jaivin Karnani, a Southern California man, his company Balls of Kryptonite LLC, and several other corporate names they did business as.".
- Q19881047 label "FTC v. Balls of Kryptonite".
- Q19881047 depiction CD_CA_seal.jpg.