Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q19864053> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 triples per page.
- Q19864053 subject Q6432134.
- Q19864053 subject Q6996562.
- Q19864053 subject Q6997005.
- Q19864053 subject Q6999017.
- Q19864053 subject Q8862624.
- Q19864053 abstract "Template:Infobox court caseAjaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp., 187 Cal.App.4th 1295 (2010), is the second appeal on a dispute dated back to 1999. During the original 2000 case, defendant E*Trade, an online financial services company, was found liable for maliciously and willfully misappropriating trade secrets pertaining to wireless stock trading technology acquired from the plaintiff, Ajaxo. Under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act E*Trade was required under a mutually signed Non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to keep Ajaxo’s trade secrets confidential. After a jury trial in 2003, E*Trade was fined $1.3 million to be paid to Ajaxo for the misappropriation and breach of NDA. The court denied Ajaxo’s request for additional damages. All parties appealed. In 2005 the California courts of appeal affirmed the original ruling but remanded the case back to the trial court to determine additional damages. A jury verdict in 2008 rejected claims raised and demands for royalty damages from Ajaxo. In trade secret cases it is common for a plaintiff to seek royalty damages when they are unable to show an actual loss or that the defendant received some inequitable benefit from the misappropriation. In this case the court refused to allow evidence of royalty damages, claiming there were no net damages. Ajaxo appealed. In 2010 the California courts of appeal once again remanded the case back to the trial court reasoning that in such cases an exact quantitative measure of wrongful enrichment damages incurred by the plaintiff might not be sufficient to reject the claim of reasonable royalties based damages".
- Q19864053 thumbnail Seal_of_California.svg?width=300.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q1053818.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q11016.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q131257.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q159394.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q1768566.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q196939.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q249.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q2607502.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q281126.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q329777.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q3824105.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q3997173.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q443955.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q468489.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q5020373.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q5469880.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q602938.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q6432134.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996562.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997005.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999017.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q728265.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q7397.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q7643515.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q7885089.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q79719.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q818977.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q837171.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q8862624.
- Q19864053 wikiPageWikiLink Q99.
- Q19864053 comment "Template:Infobox court caseAjaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp., 187 Cal.App.4th 1295 (2010), is the second appeal on a dispute dated back to 1999. During the original 2000 case, defendant E*Trade, an online financial services company, was found liable for maliciously and willfully misappropriating trade secrets pertaining to wireless stock trading technology acquired from the plaintiff, Ajaxo.".
- Q19864053 label "Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp.".
- Q19864053 depiction Seal_of_California.svg.