Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q17052648> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 triples per page.
- Q17052648 subject Q6425815.
- Q17052648 subject Q7469554.
- Q17052648 subject Q8317462.
- Q17052648 subject Q8593500.
- Q17052648 subject Q8853201.
- Q17052648 abstract "The 'Neither one nor many' argument (Wylie: gcig du 'bral ba'i gtan tshigs) is an argument employed by different philosophers and spiritual traditions for various reasons. The 'Neither one nor many argument' and its permutations and antecedents, particularly the "problem of the One and the Many" as charted by McEvilley (2002: pp. 23–66) in his magnum opus, has an ancient pedigree in the lineages of both Indian Philosophy and Greek Philosophy. McEvilley (2002) also provides strongly persuasive arguments inferring the mutual influence and mutual iteration of the ancient Indian and Greek philosophical traditions but proffers patently inconclusive and undemonstrable evidence, the perennial bugbear of historical inquiry. The argument is a factor in the algorithmic function of the Catuskoti. In its Buddhist employ, the argument is one of a suite of arguments within the purview of Pramana and Indian logic to demonstrate and test various doctrines. Different authorities and sources provide different enumerations of these said arguments, Khenpo Yonten Gyamtso lists them thus:'diamond splinters' argument (Wylie: rdo rje gzegs ma'i gtan tshigs)'refutation of production of existent and nonexistent effects' (Wylie: yod med skye 'gog gi gtan tshigs)'refutation of production related to four possible alternatives' (Wylie: mu bzhi skye ba'i gtan tshigs)'dependent arising' argument (Wylie: rten 'brel gyi gtan tshigs)argument of 'neither one nor many' (Wylie: gcig du 'bral ba'i gtan tshigs)The Padmakara Translation Group (2005: p. 39) convey the uniqueness of the Madhyamākalaṃkāra of Śāntarakṣita in Buddhist literature in its focused, dedicated and protracted employ of the "neither one nor many" argument:The Madhyamakalankara invokes the argument of "neither one nor many" more intensively (throughout sixty-two of its ninety-seven stanzas) than any other text in Buddhist literature. This argument is one of a series of proofs used to demonstrate that phenomena are without real existence.".
- Q17052648 wikiPageExternalLink bot_1982_03_01.pdf.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q1001051.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q1402155.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q1661527.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q2714540.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q2985401.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q376022.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q5054212.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q522046.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q553722.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q5656738.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q613140.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q6425815.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q6727646.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q7469554.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q8317462.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q8593500.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q8853201.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q938926.
- Q17052648 wikiPageWikiLink Q999259.
- Q17052648 comment "The 'Neither one nor many' argument (Wylie: gcig du 'bral ba'i gtan tshigs) is an argument employed by different philosophers and spiritual traditions for various reasons. The 'Neither one nor many argument' and its permutations and antecedents, particularly the "problem of the One and the Many" as charted by McEvilley (2002: pp. 23–66) in his magnum opus, has an ancient pedigree in the lineages of both Indian Philosophy and Greek Philosophy.".
- Q17052648 label "Neither one nor many".