Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q17004717> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 triples per page.
- Q17004717 subject Q6996562.
- Q17004717 subject Q6997521.
- Q17004717 subject Q6998761.
- Q17004717 subject Q8149060.
- Q17004717 abstract "Template:Infobox court case Drennan v. Star Paving Company, 51 Cal. 2d 409 (1958), was a California Supreme Court case in which the court held that a party who has detrimentally relied on an offer that is revoked prior to acceptance may assert promissory estoppel to recover damages.William A. Drennan, a general contractor, had gotten a bid from Star Paving, a subcontractor for a construction job and had included Star Paving's bid number in his total bid. After Drennan had received the contract, Star Paving contacted him to say that its initial bid had been ~$7000 short, and that it would not be able to complete the project for the amount of money it had previously specified. After finding an alternative subcontractor to complete the job, Drennan sued Star Paving for the difference between its bid and the cost.Judge Roger J. Traynor, writing for the California Supreme Court, held that the plaintiff's reliance on defendant's bid, as well as defendant's failure to indicate that the bid was revocable before acceptance, meant that defendant was responsible for providing the service at the price initially specified.In contracts courses this case is often contrasted with James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., a 1933 case with similar facts from the Second Circuit decided by Judge Learned Hand. Hand held that an offeror was free to revoke the offer prior to acceptance; twenty-five years later, when the doctrine of promissory estoppel had found wider acceptance, Traynor held that the offer was irrevocable once the offeree had relied upon it.".
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q1142833.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q16007495.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q17421788.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q21069584.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q250479.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q2629503.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q3439116.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q493155.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q6773564.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996562.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997521.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998761.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q7182367.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q8149060.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q17004717 wikiPageWikiLink Q93288.
- Q17004717 comment "Template:Infobox court case Drennan v. Star Paving Company, 51 Cal. 2d 409 (1958), was a California Supreme Court case in which the court held that a party who has detrimentally relied on an offer that is revoked prior to acceptance may assert promissory estoppel to recover damages.William A. Drennan, a general contractor, had gotten a bid from Star Paving, a subcontractor for a construction job and had included Star Paving's bid number in his total bid.".
- Q17004717 label "Drennan v. Star Paving Co.".