Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q16993736> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 triples per page.
- Q16993736 subject Q6996274.
- Q16993736 subject Q6996496.
- Q16993736 subject Q6996499.
- Q16993736 subject Q8442694.
- Q16993736 subject Q8470694.
- Q16993736 abstract "Template:Infobox court caseFox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC (C.D. Cal. January 12, 2015), is a copyright case in which the United States District Court for the Central District of California by granting partial summary judgment denied most part of the copyright claims presented by Fox Broadcasting (Fox) against Dish Network (Dish) for its service DVR-like device that allowed users to record programming that could be accessed later through any Internet connected device (Dish Anywhere). The service offered by Dish also allowed users to record any or all Fox’s (and the four major broadcast networks) prime time programs (Prime Time Any Time or PTAT) and to automatically skips commercials (AutoHop). Fox argued that Dish Network was guilty of copyright infringement and breach of contract. The district court held that Dish Anywhere did not infringe Fox’s public performance right because the service only could be used by subscribers to get access to their own recordings. The recording action and the later transmission depended on the subscribers engage in a volitional action. Therefore, there was no direct infringement from Dish. Neither was there a secondary infringement of the company because Dish’s users did not publicly perform by using Dish Anywhere. Dish had license from Fox that allows it to transmit Fox’s programing to its subscribers. When a user transmits programing from one device to another, she access in a different device to a something that already is in her possession, this action is not a public performance within the meaning of the statute. The court held that PTAT did not directly infringe Fox’s reproduction right because Dish did not engage in a volitional conduct. The recording was made in exclusive response to the user’s command. Also, the court ruled that PTAT used by Dish’s subscribers was fair use according Sony case.".
- Q16993736 thumbnail CD_CA_seal.jpg?width=300.
- Q16993736 wikiPageExternalLink www.fox.com.
- Q16993736 wikiPageExternalLink www.dish.com.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q1199757.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q1303460.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q131562.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q15078788.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q15687022.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q15995138.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q16241308.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q166419.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q17511635.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q281126.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q2898349.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q5047404.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q5137554.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q5289341.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996274.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996496.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996499.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q702358.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q723685.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q7446179.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q7562455.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q7598368.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889764.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q842729.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q8442694.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q8470694.
- Q16993736 wikiPageWikiLink Q865042.
- Q16993736 comment "Template:Infobox court caseFox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC (C.D. Cal. January 12, 2015), is a copyright case in which the United States District Court for the Central District of California by granting partial summary judgment denied most part of the copyright claims presented by Fox Broadcasting (Fox) against Dish Network (Dish) for its service DVR-like device that allowed users to record programming that could be accessed later through any Internet connected device (Dish Anywhere).".
- Q16993736 label "Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC".
- Q16993736 depiction CD_CA_seal.jpg.
- Q16993736 homepage www.fox.com.