Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q16965933> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 17 of
17
with 100 triples per page.
- Q16965933 subject Q6996360.
- Q16965933 subject Q6996997.
- Q16965933 subject Q8345603.
- Q16965933 abstract "This is a chronological list of significant Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of commodity and futures regulation.Ware & Leland v. Mobile County, 209 U.S. 405, 28 Sup. Ct. 526, 14 Ann. Cas. 1031 (1908). Contracts for the sales of cotton for future delivery which do not oblige interstate shipments are not subjects of interstate commerce, and that a state tax on persons engaged in buying and selling cotton for future delivery was held not to be a regulation of interstate commerce or beyond the power of the state.Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44 (1922) Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1 (1923)Trusler v. Crooks, 269 U.S. 475 (1926)Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936)Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986)".
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q15147967.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q183984.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q317088.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q4931384.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q5153154.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996360.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996997.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q7962937.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q7969238.
- Q16965933 wikiPageWikiLink Q8345603.
- Q16965933 comment "This is a chronological list of significant Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of commodity and futures regulation.Ware & Leland v. Mobile County, 209 U.S. 405, 28 Sup. Ct. 526, 14 Ann. Cas. 1031 (1908).".
- Q16965933 label "List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving commodity and futures regulation".