Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q12812077> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 triples per page.
- Q12812077 subject Q6463909.
- Q12812077 subject Q6486974.
- Q12812077 subject Q6490429.
- Q12812077 subject Q7217123.
- Q12812077 subject Q7217201.
- Q12812077 subject Q7235936.
- Q12812077 subject Q7235937.
- Q12812077 subject Q9831780.
- Q12812077 abstract "Neutrality is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological),which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, doublethink, equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome. For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.Alternative to acting without a bias, the bias of neutrality itself is the expectation upon the Swiss government (in Armed Neutrality), and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (in Non-interventionism).".
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q1069175.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q1203128.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q1256779.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q183225.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q188577.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q211067.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q223871.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q2669953.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q309406.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q3214913.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q34296.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q408285.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q438484.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q5167661.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q548365.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q587531.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q6463909.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q6486974.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q6490429.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q6888525.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7217123.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7217201.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7235936.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7235937.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7688238.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q815577.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q891149.
- Q12812077 wikiPageWikiLink Q9831780.
- Q12812077 comment "Neutrality is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological),which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, doublethink, equality, agreement, and objectivity.".
- Q12812077 label "Neutrality (philosophy)".