Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q1002238> ?p ?o }
- Q1002238 subject Q7470348.
- Q1002238 subject Q8428359.
- Q1002238 abstract "Criticism of Wikipedia—of the content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open-source encyclopedia of subject-entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article-layout; the existence of systemic bias, of gender bias, and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (facilitating editorial vandalism); the existence of social stratification (allowing cliques); and over-complicated rules (allowing editorial quarrels), which conditions permit the misuse of Wikipedia.Unreliable content: in "Wikipedia: The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge" (2010), Edwin Black characterized the editorial content of articles as a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods". In that vein, in "Wisdom?: More like Dumbness of the Crowds" (2011), Oliver Kamm said that the encyclopedic articles usually are dominated by the editors with the loudest and most persistent editorial voices (talk pages and edit summaries), usually by an interest group with an ideological “axe to grind” on the subject, topic, or theme of the article in question.Politics and ideology: in "The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Wikipedia" (2012), by Timothy Messer–Kruse, and in "You Just Type in What You are Looking for: Undergraduates' Use of Library Resources vs. Wikipedia" (2012), by Mónica Colón–Aguirre and Rachel A. Fleming–May, the authors analyzed and criticized the undue-weight policy (relative importance of a given source), and concluded that, because the purpose of Wikipedia is not about providing correct and definitive information about a subject, but to present, as editorially dominant, the majority-opinion perspective taken by the authors of the sources for the article; therefore, the uneven application of the undue-weight policy creates omissions (of fact and of interpretation) that might give the reader false knowledge about the subject matter, which knowledge the reader has based upon the factually-incomplete content of the Wikipedia article.Hostile environment: in Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia (2014), Dariusz Jemielniak (a Wikipedia steward), said that the complexity of the rules and laws governing editorial content and the behavior of the editors is a burden for new editors and a licence for the “office politics” of disruptive editors. In the follow-up article, "The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Wikipedia" (2014), Jemielniak said that abridging and rewriting the editorial rules-and-laws of Wikipedia for clarity of purpose and simplicity of application would resolve the bureaucratic bottleneck of too many rules. In The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity is Causing its Decline (2013), Aaron Halfaker said that the over-complicated rules and laws of Wikipedia unintentionally provoked the decline in editorial participation that began in 2009 — frightening away new editors who otherwise would contribute to Wikipedia.Misuse: in "Wikipedia or Wickedpedia?" (2008), the Hoover Institution said that Wikipedia is an unreliable resource for correct knowledge, information, and facts about a subject, because, as an open-source website, the editorial content of the articles is readily subjected to manipulation and propaganda. Therefore, in academia, the handbook Academic Integrity at MIT (2014), officially informs students that Wikipedia is not a reliable academic source, that “the bibliography published at the end of the Wikipedia entry may point you to potential sources. However, do not assume that these sources are reliable — use the same criteria to judge them as you would any other source. Do not consider the Wikipedia bibliography as a replacement for your own research.”".
- Q1002238 wikiPageExternalLink index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&diff=234778085&oldid=234741793.
- Q1002238 wikiPageExternalLink the-geographically-uneven-coverage-of-wikipedia.
- Q1002238 wikiPageExternalLink a-compendium-of-wikipedia-criticism.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1025062.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1029430.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q10390.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1048635.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1054021.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1058876.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1060566.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1067299.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q11028.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q11135.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q11148.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1154390.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q11701.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q12078.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1220078.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q124147.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1256173.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1298389.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q131036.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q13360183.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1347030.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q13477.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1353826.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1360149.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q136638.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1370.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1410600.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1416417.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q143304.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q144334.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1475036.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q14820885.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1487.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q15439592.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1567585.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1570656.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q15710541.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q157546.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1587677.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1603.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q16235110.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q164746.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1658723.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q166032.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q16835260.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q169889.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1699649.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q17002416.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q171091.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q171841.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q172618.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q17459.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1770320.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1777448.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q178079.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q178598.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q17963.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q180.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q180089.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1809268.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q181.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q18114445.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1820380.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1820650.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q185.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q18627581.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q187801.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q188728.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q188759.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q190084.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q19042.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q191783.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q192.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1929421.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q193582.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q195951.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1969573.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q1970852.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q19786.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q19873.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q19894322.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q204606.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q20675975.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q207.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q207079.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q2072081.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q2088357.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q212886.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q217305.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q22.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q22169.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q2227214.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q22753.
- Q1002238 wikiPageWikiLink Q2283.