Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn/> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 triples per page.
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn accessdate "2011-01-02".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn archivedate "2011-01-06".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn archiveurl "http://web.archive.org/web/20110106114643/http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn/".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn author "New York Times".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn date "2011-01-02".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn deadurl "no".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn isCitedBy 2011_Fiesta_Bowl.
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn title "Rose Bowl Ratings Fall, But Are Still Good for ESPN".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn url "http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn/".
- rose-bowl-ratings-fall-but-are-still-good-for-espn work "The New York Times".