Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.83.1> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 triples per page.
- revmodphys.83.1 arxiv "1004.0115".
- revmodphys.83.1 author1 "John G. Hartnett".
- revmodphys.83.1 author2 "Andre Luiten".
- revmodphys.83.1 author2 "Luiten, Andre".
- revmodphys.83.1 bibcode "2011RvMP...83....1H".
- revmodphys.83.1 date "2011".
- revmodphys.83.1 doi "10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1".
- revmodphys.83.1 first "John".
- revmodphys.83.1 first1 "J. G.".
- revmodphys.83.1 first2 "A. N.".
- revmodphys.83.1 isCitedBy John_Hartnett_(physicist).
- revmodphys.83.1 isCitedBy List_of_Christians_in_science_and_technology.
- revmodphys.83.1 isCitedBy PSR_J0437-4715.
- revmodphys.83.1 isCitedBy Pulsar.
- revmodphys.83.1 journal "Reviews of Modern Physics".
- revmodphys.83.1 last "Hartnett".
- revmodphys.83.1 last1 "Hartnett".
- revmodphys.83.1 last2 "Luiten".
- revmodphys.83.1 pages "1".
- revmodphys.83.1 pages "1–9".
- revmodphys.83.1 publisher "Cornell University Library, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, 2011".
- revmodphys.83.1 quote "We have re-analyzed the stability of pulse arrival times from pulsars and white dwarfs using several analysis tools for measuring the noise characteristics of sampled time and frequency data. We show that the best terrestrial artificial clocks substantially exceed the performance of astronomical sources as time-keepers in terms of accuracy and stability. ...we show that detailed accuracy evaluations of modern terrestrial clocks imply that these new clocks are likely to have a stability better than any astronomical source up to comparison times of at least hundreds of years.".
- revmodphys.83.1 title "Colloquium: Comparison of Astrophysical and Terrestrial Frequency Standards".
- revmodphys.83.1 title "Colloquium: Comparison of astrophysical and terrestrial frequency standards".
- revmodphys.83.1 url 1004.0115.
- revmodphys.83.1 volume "83".
- revmodphys.83.1 year "2011".