Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 16 of
16
with 100 triples per page.
- nature16069 date "2015-12-03".
- nature16069 doi "10.1038/nature16069".
- nature16069 first1 "J.".
- nature16069 first2 "M.".
- nature16069 isCitedBy Dark_earth.
- nature16069 isCitedBy Humic_acid.
- nature16069 isCitedBy Humin.
- nature16069 isCitedBy Humus.
- nature16069 journal "Nature".
- nature16069 last1 "Lehmann".
- nature16069 last2 "Kleber".
- nature16069 quote "The development of this extraction method preceded theory, tempting scientists to develop explanations for the synthesis of materials resembling operationally extracted ‘humic substances’, rather than to develop an understanding of the nature of all organic matter in soil.".
- nature16069 quote "The issue has also been approached by redefining ‘humic substances’ as the portion of soil organic matter that cannot be molecularly characterized or by calling all soil organic matter ‘humus’. We argue that this compromise - maintaining terminology but altering its meanings in varying ways — hampers scientific progress beyond the soil sciences.The [need for accurate models] of soil organic matter does not allow a confusing middle path; it requires leaving the traditional view behind to bring about lasting innovation and progress. This is critical as scientific fields outside the soil sciences base their research on the false premise of the existence of ‘humic substances’. Thus an issue of terminology becomes a problem of false inference, with far-reaching implications beyond our ability to communicate scientifically accurate soil processes and properties.".
- nature16069 quote "This lack of evidence means that 'humification' is increasingly questioned, yet the underlying theory persists in the contemporary literature, including current textbooks.".
- nature16069 title "The contentious nature of soil organic matter".
- nature16069 volume "528".