Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Valentine_v._United_States> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 triples per page.
- Valentine_v._United_States abstract "Valentine v. United States, 299 U.S. 5 (1936), is known in the study of international criminal law for its contribution to the concept that while it is permissible for the United States to receive an accused without a treaty-based extradition, the United States itself will not extradite without authority found in statute or treaty.In this case the respondents, native-born citizens of the United States, were charged with the commission of crimes in France. These crimes were among the extraditable offenses listed in the Franco-American Extradition Treaty of 1909. The respondents fled to the United States, were arrested in New York City on the request of the French authorities, and were held for extradition proceedings. The respondents sued to prevent their extradition from the United States to France under the Treaty of 1909. The respondents challenged the courts jurisdiction, arguing that because Article V of the Treaty of 1909 excepted citizens of the United States from extradition, the President had no constitutional authority to surrender the respondents to France.Article V of the Treaty of 1909 stated that “Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention.”The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the orders of the District Judge, sustained the contention of the respondents, and directed their discharge. Certiorari was granted by the U.S. Supreme Court.The Court stated that the surrender of US citizens by the government must find its sanction in U.S. law. Although extradition is a federal power, the power to provide for extradition is not confided to the Executive in the absence of treaty or legislative provision. The proceedings against the respondents must be authorized by law. Since that legal authority does not exist unless it is given by an act of Congress or by the terms of a treaty, it is not enough that the statute or treaty does not deny the power to surrender a citizen. It must be found that a statute or treaty confers such a power. The Court looked to the Treaty of 1909 to determine whether the power to surrender the respondents in this instance was conferred by the treaty itself. The treaty explicitly denies any obligation to surrender citizens, but save an obligation the court looked to determine whether the treaty contained a grant of power to surrender a citizen. The Court affirmed the decree of the Circuit Court and held that the President’s power, in absence of statute conferring an independent power, must be found in the terms of the treaty and that, as the treaty with France fails to grant the necessary authority, the President is without the power to surrender the respondents.".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageID "20166474".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageLength "4212".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageOutDegree "15".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "644770698".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Act_of_Congress.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Case_citation.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:1936_in_United_States_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:Extradition_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:France–United_States_relations.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_foreign_relations_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Certiorari.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink France.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Franco-American_Extradition_Treaty_of_1909.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink United_States.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLinkText "Valentine v. United States".
- Valentine_v._United_States arguedatea "--10-12".
- Valentine_v._United_States arguedateb "13".
- Valentine_v._United_States argueyear "1936".
- Valentine_v._United_States citation "57".
- Valentine_v._United_States decidedate "--11-09".
- Valentine_v._United_States decideyear "1936".
- Valentine_v._United_States fullname "Jimmy Ray Valentine, Police Commissioner of New York City, et al. v. United States ex rel. B. Coles Neidecker; Together with No. 7, Valentine, Police Commissioner, et al. v. U.S. ex rel. George W. Neidecker; and No. 8, Valentine, Police Commissioner, et al. v. U.S. ex rel. Aubrey Neidecker".
- Valentine_v._United_States holding "The Executive has no power to extradite citizens of the United States without binding authority through an Act of Congress.".
- Valentine_v._United_States joinmajority "Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Roberts, Cardozo".
- Valentine_v._United_States lawsapplied "U.S. Const. Arts. I and II".
- Valentine_v._United_States litigants "Valentine v. United States".
- Valentine_v._United_States majority "Hughes".
- Valentine_v._United_States notparticipating "Stone".
- Valentine_v._United_States prior "Appeal from the 2nd Court of Appeals".
- Valentine_v._United_States scotus "1932".
- Valentine_v._United_States uspage "5".
- Valentine_v._United_States usvol "299".
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Valentine_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Wikisource.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:1936_in_United_States_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:Extradition_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:France–United_States_relations.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court.
- Valentine_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_foreign_relations_case_law.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Case.
- Valentine_v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Valentine_v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Valentine_v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Redirect.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Relation.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Situation.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Thing.
- Valentine_v._United_States type Q2334719.
- Valentine_v._United_States comment "Valentine v. United States, 299 U.S. 5 (1936), is known in the study of international criminal law for its contribution to the concept that while it is permissible for the United States to receive an accused without a treaty-based extradition, the United States itself will not extradite without authority found in statute or treaty.In this case the respondents, native-born citizens of the United States, were charged with the commission of crimes in France.".
- Valentine_v._United_States label "Valentine v. United States".
- Valentine_v._United_States sameAs Q7911037.
- Valentine_v._United_States sameAs m.04ydg3h.
- Valentine_v._United_States sameAs Q7911037.
- Valentine_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Valentine_v._United_States?oldid=644770698.
- Valentine_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Valentine_v._United_States.
- Valentine_v._United_States name "Jimmy Ray Valentine, Police Commissioner of New York City, et al. v. United States ex rel. B. Coles Neidecker; Together with No. 7, Valentine, Police Commissioner, et al. v. U.S. ex rel. George W. Neidecker; and No. 8, Valentine, Police Commissioner, et al. v. U.S. ex rel. Aubrey Neidecker".