Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 triples per page.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District abstract "Shanley v. Northeast Independent School District was a United States Federal Appeals Court decision issued in 1972 that outlined the limited power and reach of a public school system to apply administrative sanctions against the speech or written expression of its students when produced and/or distributed off school grounds and outside school hours. The case involved the suspension of five high school seniors in the North East Independent School District of San Antonio, Texas. The students were accused of publishing an unapproved newsletter called The Awakening and disseminating it to students on a street nearby to the school grounds. The newsletter contained a statements advocating a review of marijuana laws, providing information about birth control, and other topics the school judged to be inappropriate and controversial. The principal suspended the five students for violating a school board policy which read,...any attempt to avoid the school's established procedure for administrative approval of activities such as the production for distribution and/or distribution of petitions or printed documents of any kind, sort, or type without the specific approval of the principal shall be cause for suspension and, if in the judgment of the principal, there is justification, for referral to the office of the Superintendent with a recommendation for expulsion...The students each ranked as \"good\" or \"excellent\" students, and the suspensions resulted in a substantial drop in their school scores, having a potentially significant impact on their college admissions. The North East Independent school board upheld the suspensions, and the parents of the students then sought both temporary and permanent injunctive relief in the federal courts. A Texas district court denied all relief and dismissed the plaintiffs' case on its own motion, judging the case to be \"wholly without merit\". The district court also refused the plaintiff's request for injunction until an appeal could be heard. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals expedited the appeal and itself issued an injunction against the school to preserve the students' academic records while the appeal went forward. Following arguments from all parties, the Appeals Court found the North East school district's speech policy failed to set any limits with regard to time, place, or content of expression that required students to seek prior approval from the school. The Court also found the school district failed to outline any administrative course of action enabling students to appeal when charged with violating the broadly applied policy. Schools can limit the expression of its students when it materially and substantially interferes with school activities, or with the rights of teachers and other students, the Court wrote in its decision. But schools cannot restrict such expression on the sole basis that some school officials, students or parents object to the content. Taking note of the almost unprecedented latitude granted by the policy to school officials to regulate students' out-of-school behavior, the Court weighed several factors to judge whether the policy established reasonable or unreasonable limits on student expression.It is clear...that the authority of the school board to balance school discipline against the First Amendment by forbidding or punishing off-campus activity cannot exceed its authority to forbid or punish on-campus activity. Therefore, we must first examine the authority of the school board to order the actions of students on school grounds and within school hours.Quoting from another case relating to policies regulating student speech while at school, Burnside v. Byars, the Court went on to sayIn formulating regulations, including those pertaining to the discipline of school children, school officials have a wide latitude of discretion. But the school is always bound by the requirement that the rules and regulations must be reasonable. It is not for us to consider whether such rules are wise or expedient but merely whether they are a reasonable exercise of the power and discretion of the school authorities . . . . [W]e must also emphasize that school officials cannot ignore expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend. They cannot infringe on their students' right to free and unrestricted expression as guaranteed to them under the First Amendment to the Constitution, where the exercise of such rights in the school buildings and schoolrooms do not materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school.While schools can establish policies restraining student expression which are reasonable and which are intended to prevent disruptions within their schools, the Court wrote, the \"burden of demonstrating reasonableness becomes geometrically heavier as its decision begins to focus upon the content of materials that are not obscene, libelous, or inflammatory\".The Fifth Circuit Appeals Court reversed the lower court, finding for the Plaintiff that the North East Independent School District policy was overly broad, and the district's suspension of those five students had interfered with their rights to free speech as guaranteed under the First and the Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageID "26474750".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageLength "8015".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageOutDegree "31".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageRevisionID "677707812".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Birth_control.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Board_of_education.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Burnside_v._Byars.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Cannabis_in_the_United_States.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:1972_in_United_States_case_law.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:Education_in_Bexar_County,_Texas.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:High_school_newspapers_published_in_the_United_States.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:Student_newspapers_published_in_Texas.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Charles_Clark_(judge).
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink College_admissions_in_the_United_States.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Injunction.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Irving_Loeb_Goldberg.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink John_Minor_Wisdom.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Motion_in_United_States_law.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink North_East_Independent_School_District.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink San_Antonio.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Suspension_(punishment).
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink Texas.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Constitution.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink United_States_courts_of_appeals.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink United_States_district_court.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLink File:US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageWikiLinkText "Shanley v. Northeast Independent School District".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District citations "17280.0".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District concurrence "Clark".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District court "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District courtseal "150".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District decidedate "--06-09".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District decideyear "1972".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District fullname "Mark Stephen Shanley, by Next Friend, et al., v. Northeastern Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, etc., et al.".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District holding "Unreasonable restrictions imposed by public schools on student expression is an unconstitutional infringement of the First Amendment; District Court reversed by 5th Circuit Appeals Court".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District judges Charles_Clark_(judge).
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District judges Irving_Loeb_Goldberg.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District judges John_Minor_Wisdom.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District litigants "Shanley v. Northeast".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District majority "Goldberg".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District prior "Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief from school's sanctions, District Court found case "wholly without merit" and dismissed on own motion".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subsequent "expedited appeal".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_COA_case.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:1972_in_United_States_case_law.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:Education_in_Bexar_County,_Texas.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:High_school_newspapers_published_in_the_United_States.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:Student_newspapers_published_in_Texas.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District comment "Shanley v. Northeast Independent School District was a United States Federal Appeals Court decision issued in 1972 that outlined the limited power and reach of a public school system to apply administrative sanctions against the speech or written expression of its students when produced and/or distributed off school grounds and outside school hours. The case involved the suspension of five high school seniors in the North East Independent School District of San Antonio, Texas.".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District label "Shanley v. Northeast Independent School District".
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District sameAs Q7488771.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District sameAs m.0bby216.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District sameAs Q7488771.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District wasDerivedFrom Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District?oldid=677707812.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-5thCircuit-Seal.png.
- Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District isPrimaryTopicOf Shanley_v._Northeast_Independent_School_District.