Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Prosper> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 triples per page.
- R_v_Prosper abstract "R v Prosper, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 236 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to duty counsel upon arrest or detainment by police under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court found that merely reading the accused his or her rights is insufficient to discharge the right to counsel; the police must also provide the accused with access to legal aid or duty counsel.Cyril Prosper was pulled over by the police for driving erratically. The police noticed that he was severely inebriated and arrested him. They read him his rights and provided him access to a telephone and telephone directory to call a lawyer. He declined to call a lawyer in private practice as he said he could not afford it. He then agreed to take a Breathalyzer test.At trial Prosper successfully argued that Breathalyzer results were taken in violation of his Charter rights to counsel under section 10(b).The question before the Supreme Court was first, whether section 10(b) of the Charter imposes a substantive constitutional obligation on governments to ensure that duty counsel is available upon arrest or detention to provide free and immediate preliminary legal advice upon request. Second, whether the evidence should be excluded under section 24(2) of the Charter as it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.The court unanimously held that the Charter does not impose an obligation to ensure duty counsel is available upon arrest. In a five to three decision the Court held that the evidence should be excluded.".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageID "4525819".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageLength "2620".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageOutDegree "13".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageRevisionID "641521322".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Arrest.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Breathalyzer.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Category:1994_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Category:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Category:Canadian_criminal_procedure_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Duty_counsel.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Legal_aid.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Lamer_Court).
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Section_Ten_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Section_Twenty-four_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_Canada.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageWikiLinkText "R v Prosper".
- R_v_Prosper caseName "R v Prosper".
- R_v_Prosper citations "[1994] 3 S.C.R. 236".
- R_v_Prosper concurrence "McLachlin J.".
- R_v_Prosper decidedDate "1994-09-29".
- R_v_Prosper dissent "Gonthier J.".
- R_v_Prosper dissent "L'Heureux‑Dubé J.".
- R_v_Prosper dissent "La Forest J.".
- R_v_Prosper dissent "Major J.".
- R_v_Prosper docket "23178".
- R_v_Prosper fullCaseName "Cyril Partick Prosper v Her Majesty The Queen".
- R_v_Prosper heardDate "--03-02".
- R_v_Prosper joinmajority "Sopinka, Cory and Iacobucci JJ.".
- R_v_Prosper majority "Lamer C.J.".
- R_v_Prosper scc "1994".
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Canada-law-stub.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Lexum-scc2.
- R_v_Prosper wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCCInfoBox.
- R_v_Prosper subject Category:1994_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper subject Category:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper subject Category:Canadian_criminal_procedure_case_law.
- R_v_Prosper subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R_v_Prosper hypernym Decision.
- R_v_Prosper type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- R_v_Prosper comment "R v Prosper, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 236 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to duty counsel upon arrest or detainment by police under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court found that merely reading the accused his or her rights is insufficient to discharge the right to counsel; the police must also provide the accused with access to legal aid or duty counsel.Cyril Prosper was pulled over by the police for driving erratically.".
- R_v_Prosper label "R v Prosper".
- R_v_Prosper sameAs Q7274295.
- R_v_Prosper sameAs m.0c7531.
- R_v_Prosper sameAs Q7274295.
- R_v_Prosper wasDerivedFrom R_v_Prosper?oldid=641521322.
- R_v_Prosper isPrimaryTopicOf R_v_Prosper.