DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/One-sided_argument> ?p ?o }

• One-sided_argument abstract "A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted.Peter Suber has written: \"The one-sidedness fallacy does not make an argument invalid. It may not even make the argument unsound. The fallacy consists in persuading readers, and perhaps ourselves, that we have said enough to tilt the scale of evidence and therefore enough to justify a judgment. If we have been one-sided, though, then we haven't yet said enough to justify a judgment. The arguments on the other side may be stronger than our own. We won't know until we examine them. So the one-sidedness fallacy doesn't mean that your premises are false or irrelevant, only that they are incomplete.\"\"With rational messages, you need to decide if you want to use a one-sided argument or a two-sided argument. A one-sided argument only presents the pro side of the argument, while a two-sided argument presents both sides. Which one you use will depend on which one meets your needs and the type of audience. Generally, one-sided arguments are better with audiences already favorable to your message. Two-sided arguments are best with audiences who are opposed to your argument, are better educated or have already been exposed to counter arguments.\"".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageExternalLink onesided.htm.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageExternalLink 6547.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageExternalLink 33710086.html.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageID "1568924".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageLength "2584".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageOutDegree "7".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageRevisionID "642988496".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Category:Arguments.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Category:Informal_fallacies.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Cherry_picking.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Confirmation_bias.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Informal_fallacy.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink pars_construens.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLink Special_pleading.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLinkText "One-sided argument".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageWikiLinkText "one-sided".
• One-sided_argument wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Logic-stub.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Merge_to.
• One-sided_argument wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
• One-sided_argument subject Category:Arguments.
• One-sided_argument subject Category:Informal_fallacies.
• One-sided_argument hypernym Fallacy.
• One-sided_argument type Argument.
• One-sided_argument type Fallacy.
• One-sided_argument type Statement.
• One-sided_argument type Statement.
• One-sided_argument comment "A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted.Peter Suber has written: \"The one-sidedness fallacy does not make an argument invalid. It may not even make the argument unsound.".
• One-sided_argument label "One-sided argument".
• One-sided_argument sameAs Q7092337.
• One-sided_argument sameAs m.05c3vy.
• One-sided_argument sameAs การให้เหตุผลข้างเดียว.
• One-sided_argument sameAs Q7092337.
• One-sided_argument wasDerivedFrom One-sided_argument?oldid=642988496.
• One-sided_argument isPrimaryTopicOf One-sided_argument.