Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 triples per page.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc abstract "O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 728 was a UK labour law case, in which a bare majority held that a requirement for a contract is \"mutuality of obligation\" between the parties, which was thought to mean an ongoing duty to offer and accept work. It has been consistently doubted, and its outcome reversed by legislation, and its reasoning superseded by Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher, which states that the only \"mutual\" obligations that are required is the consideration of work for a quid pro quo.".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc thumbnail Grosvenorhouselogo.JPG?width=300.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageID "17157256".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageLength "3310".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageOutDegree "21".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageRevisionID "697481360".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Autoclenz_Ltd_v_Belcher.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Carmichael_v_National_Power_plc.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:1983_in_British_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:1983_in_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_equality_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_trade_union_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Contract.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Derry_Irvine,_Baron_Irvine_of_Lairg.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Employment_Rights_Act_1996.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Grosvenor_House_Hotel.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink John_Donaldson,_Baron_Donaldson_of_Lymington.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Nethermere_(St_Neots)_Ltd_v_Gardiner.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Quid_pro_quo.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Ready_Mixed_Concrete_(South_East)_Ltd_v_Minister_of_Pensions_and_National_Insurance.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Trade_Union_and_Labour_Relations_(Consolidation)_Act_1992.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink Unfair_dismissal.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink United_Kingdom_agency_worker_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLink United_Kingdom_labour_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageWikiLinkText "O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc citations "[1983] ICR 728".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc court "Court of Appeal".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc keywords "Employment contract, mutuality of obligation, casual worker, union discrimination".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc name "O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_Court_Case.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:1983_in_British_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:1983_in_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:United_Kingdom_equality_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc subject Category:United_Kingdom_trade_union_case_law.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc hypernym Case.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc type Redirect.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc comment "O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 728 was a UK labour law case, in which a bare majority held that a requirement for a contract is \"mutuality of obligation\" between the parties, which was thought to mean an ongoing duty to offer and accept work. It has been consistently doubted, and its outcome reversed by legislation, and its reasoning superseded by Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher, which states that the only \"mutual\" obligations that are required is the consideration of work for a quid pro quo.".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc label "O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc".
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc sameAs Q7071850.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc sameAs m.043mbl5.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc sameAs Q7071850.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc wasDerivedFrom OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc?oldid=697481360.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc depiction Grosvenorhouselogo.JPG.
- OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc isPrimaryTopicOf OKelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc.