Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton_v_Lessels> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 triples per page.
- Luton_v_Lessels abstract "Luton v Lessels (2002) 165 CLR 462 is a High Court of Australia case that affirms previous High Court definitions of a tax.".
- Luton_v_Lessels thumbnail Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageExternalLink 13.html.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageID "5663163".
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageLength "2880".
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageOutDegree "18".
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageRevisionID "689033892".
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Australian_constitutional_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Category:2002_in_Australian_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Category:2002_in_case_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Category:Taxation_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Commonwealth_Law_Reports.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Constitution_of_Australia.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Constitutional_basis_of_taxation_in_Australia.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink George_Winterton.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink High_Court_of_Australia.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Ian_Callinan.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Kenneth_Hayne.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Mary_Gaudron.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Michael_Kirby_(judge).
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Michael_McHugh.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLink Murray_Gleeson.
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageWikiLinkText "Luton v Lessels".
- Luton_v_Lessels citations 13.html.
- Luton_v_Lessels court High_Court_of_Australia.
- Luton_v_Lessels dateDecided "2002-04-11".
- Luton_v_Lessels fullName "Luton v Lessels & Anor".
- Luton_v_Lessels judges "Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ".
- Luton_v_Lessels name "Luton v Lessels".
- Luton_v_Lessels opinions "' The scheme established by the Child Support Act 1988 and the Child Support Act 1989 for the collection and payment of money otherwise payable to or receivable by the recipient is not a tax ' The Acts do not confer on the Child Support Agency judicial power and are not offensive to the doctrine of separation of powers".
- Luton_v_Lessels priorActions "none".
- Luton_v_Lessels subsequentActions "none".
- Luton_v_Lessels wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Luton_v_Lessels subject Category:2002_in_Australian_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels subject Category:2002_in_case_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Luton_v_Lessels subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Luton_v_Lessels subject Category:Taxation_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Luton_v_Lessels hypernym Court.
- Luton_v_Lessels type Place.
- Luton_v_Lessels comment "Luton v Lessels (2002) 165 CLR 462 is a High Court of Australia case that affirms previous High Court definitions of a tax.".
- Luton_v_Lessels label "Luton v Lessels".
- Luton_v_Lessels sameAs Q6705908.
- Luton_v_Lessels sameAs m.0dywp5.
- Luton_v_Lessels sameAs Q6705908.
- Luton_v_Lessels wasDerivedFrom Luton_v_Lessels?oldid=689033892.
- Luton_v_Lessels depiction Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg.
- Luton_v_Lessels isPrimaryTopicOf Luton_v_Lessels.