DBpedia – Linked Data Fragments

Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security> ?p ?o }

• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security abstract "K v Minister of Safety and Security is an important case in the South African law of delict and South African constitutional law. It was heard by the Constitutional Court on May 10, 2005, with judgment handed down on June 13. Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J, Van der Westhuizen J and Yacoob J presided. W. Trengove SC (with him K. Pillay) appeared for the applicant; PF Louw SC (with him JA Babamia) appeared for the respondent. The applicant's counsel was instructed by the Women's Legal Centre, Cape Town. The respondent's attorney was the State Attorney, Johannesburg.The first question addressed in this case was ambit of the courts' duty to develop the common law in accordance with the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights as intended in section 39(2) of Constitution. The purpose of that section, it was determined, is to ensure that the normative value system created by the Constitution permeates the common law. The courts are bound by section 39(2) not only when contemplating a radical departure from existing common-law rules, but also when an incremental development thereof in issue.The second and more central question was the constitutionality of the common-law principles underlying the vicarious liability of an employer for the delictual acts of his employee. The court distinguished between the principles themselves and their application. The traditional notion of the application of these principles as matter of fact untrammelled by considerations of law or normative principles was found to be constitutionally untenable. The application of the principles was accordingly in need of development to conform to the normative framework of the Constitution. This meant no more than that a court must bear in mind constitutional norms when deciding whether the case before it is in principle one in which the employer should be held liable. The principles themselves, as embodied in the present two-stage test, focusing on the subjective question as to the state of mind of the employee, together with the objective question as to whether there is a sufficient link between the conduct of the employee and the employer's enterprise, were found to be consistent with constitutional norms.The particular question to be decided in this matter was the liability of the Minister of Safety and Security for criminal acts committed by police officers while on duty. The police officers in question had been found guilty of rape. To determine whether or not the Minister was vicariously liable, the court used a two-stage common-law test for liability, developed in light of the normative framework of the Constitution. This test, drawn from the case of Minister of Police v Rabie had both a subjective stage (evaluating the state of mind of the employee) and an objective stage (considering the link between the delict and the employer's enterprise). The policemen, subjectively viewed, were found to have acted in pursuit of their own objectives. Their conduct, however, was sufficiently linked to their employment as policemen, particularly when viewed against the background of the Constitution. The Minister, accordingly, was held to be vicariously liable.".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageID "38200826".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageLength "14528".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageOutDegree "42".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageRevisionID "637231754".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Absa_Bank_Ltd_v_Bond_Equipment_(Pretoria)_(Pty)_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink African_Guarantee_&_Indemnity_Co_Ltd_v_Minister_of_Justice.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Bazley_v_Curry.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Bezuidenhout_NO_v_Eskom.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Carmichele_v_Minister_of_Safety_&_Security.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Carter_&_Co_(Pty)_Ltd_v_McDonald.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Category:2005_in_South_African_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Category:2005_in_case_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Category:Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa_cases.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Category:South_African_delict_case_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Commissioner,_South_African_Revenue_Service_v_TFN_Diamond_Cutting_Works_(Pty)_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Ess_Kay_Electronics_Pte_Ltd_and_Another_v_First_National_Bank_of_Southern_Africa_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Estate_Van_der_Byl_v_Swanepoel.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Feldman_(Pty)_Ltd_v_Mall.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Govender_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Grobler_v_Naspers_Bpk_en_n_Ander.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Hirsch_Appliance_Specialists_v_Shield_Security_Natal_(Pty)_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Jacobi_v_Griffiths.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Jordaan_v_Bloemfontein_Transitional_Local_Authority_and_Another.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security_(SCA).
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Lister_and_Others_v_Hesley_Hall_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink London_Drugs_Ltd_v_Kuehne_&_Nagel_International_Ltd.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Minister_of_Law_and_Order_v_Ngobo.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Minister_of_Police_v_Rabie.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink a_Andre_Jordaan_Transport.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink a_Status_Motors.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Minister_van_Veiligheid_en_Sekuriteit_v_Phoebus_Apollo_Aviation_BK.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Mkize_v_Martens.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Phoebus_Apollo_Aviation_CC_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Police_Act.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Primeaux_v_United_States.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink a_Metrorail_and_Others.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink S_v_Basson.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink S_v_Thebus_and_Another.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Sea_Harvest_Corporation_(Pty)_Ltd_and_Another_v_Duncan_Dock_Cold_Storage_(Pty)_Ltd_and_Another.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink South_African_Railways_and_Harbours_v_Marais.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink South_African_law_of_delict.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Tshabalala_v_Lekoa_City_Council.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Venter_v_Bophuthatswana_Transport_Holdings_(Edms)_Bpk.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLink Viljoen_v_Smith.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageWikiLinkText "K v Minister of Safety and Security".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security subject Category:2005_in_South_African_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security subject Category:2005_in_case_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security subject Category:Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa_cases.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security subject Category:South_African_delict_case_law.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security hypernym Case.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security comment "K v Minister of Safety and Security is an important case in the South African law of delict and South African constitutional law. It was heard by the Constitutional Court on May 10, 2005, with judgment handed down on June 13. Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J, Van der Westhuizen J and Yacoob J presided. W. Trengove SC (with him K. Pillay) appeared for the applicant; PF Louw SC (with him JA Babamia) appeared for the respondent.".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security label "K v Minister of Safety and Security".
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security sameAs Q6343048.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security sameAs m.0pk_9xx.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security sameAs Q6343048.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security wasDerivedFrom K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security?oldid=637231754.
• K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security isPrimaryTopicOf K_v_Minister_of_Safety_and_Security.