Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Insolubilia> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 triples per page.
- Insolubilia abstract "In the Middle Ages, variations on the liar paradox were studied under the name of insolubilia (insolubles).Although the liar paradox was well known in antiquity, interest seems to have lapsed until the twelfth century, when it appears to have been reinvented independently of ancient authors. Medieval interest may have been inspired by a passage in the Sophistical Refutations of Aristotle. Although the Sophistical Refutations are consistently cited by medieval logicians from the earliest insolubilia literature, medieval studies of insolubilia go well beyond Aristotle. Other ancient sources which could suggest the liar paradox, including Saint Augustine, Cicero, and the quotation of Epimenides appearing in the Epistle to Titus, were not cited in discussions of insolubilia.Adam of Balsham mentioned, in passing, some paradoxical statements (dated to 1132), but he did not dwell on the difficulties raised by these statements. Alexander Neckham, writing later in the twelfth century, explicitly recognized the paradoxical nature of insolubilia, but did not attempt to resolve the inconsistent implications of the paradox. The first resolution was given by an anonymous author at the end of the twelfth or beginning of the thirteenth century. There was an established literature on the topic by about 1320, when Thomas Bradwardine prefaced his own discussion of insolubilia with nine views then current. Interest in insolubilia continued throughout the fourteenth century, especially by Jean Buridan.The medieval insolubilia literature seems to treat these paradoxes as difficult but not truly \"insoluble\", and, though interesting and meriting investigation, not central to the study of logic. This may be contrasted with modern studies of self-referential paradoxes such as Russell's paradox, in which the problems are seen as fundamentally insoluble, and central to the foundations of logic.".
- Insolubilia wikiPageID "1034227".
- Insolubilia wikiPageLength "2675".
- Insolubilia wikiPageOutDegree "17".
- Insolubilia wikiPageRevisionID "629020315".
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Adam_Parvipontanus.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Alexander_Neckam.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Ancient_history.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Aristotle.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Augustine_of_Hippo.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Category:History_of_logic.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Category:Paradoxes.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Cicero.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Epimenides.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Epistle_to_Titus.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Jean_Buridan.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Liar_paradox.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Middle_Ages.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Russells_paradox.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Sophistical_Refutations.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLink Thomas_Bradwardine.
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLinkText "Insolubilia".
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLinkText "insolubilia".
- Insolubilia wikiPageWikiLinkText "insolubles".
- Insolubilia wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Insolubilia wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Sep_entry.
- Insolubilia subject Category:History_of_logic.
- Insolubilia subject Category:Paradoxes.
- Insolubilia type Concept.
- Insolubilia comment "In the Middle Ages, variations on the liar paradox were studied under the name of insolubilia (insolubles).Although the liar paradox was well known in antiquity, interest seems to have lapsed until the twelfth century, when it appears to have been reinvented independently of ancient authors. Medieval interest may have been inspired by a passage in the Sophistical Refutations of Aristotle.".
- Insolubilia label "Insolubilia".
- Insolubilia sameAs Q6038226.
- Insolubilia sameAs Insolubilia.
- Insolubilia sameAs m.0404ps.
- Insolubilia sameAs Q6038226.
- Insolubilia wasDerivedFrom Insolubilia?oldid=629020315.
- Insolubilia isPrimaryTopicOf Insolubilia.