Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Great_Rationality_Debate> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 triples per page.
- Great_Rationality_Debate abstract "The Rationality Debate — also called the Great Rationality Debate — is the question of whether humans are rational or not. This issue is a topic in the study of cognition and is important in fields such as economics where it is relevant to the theories of market efficiency.Many studies in experimental psychology have shown that humans often reason in a way that is inaccurate or imperfect — that they do not naturally chose the ideal method or solution. An example of a problem which causes difficulty and debate is the St. Petersburg paradox. This is a lottery which is constructed so that the expected value is infinite but unlikely so that most people will not pay a large fee to play. Gerd Gigerenzer explained that, in this case, mathematicians refined their formulae to model this pragmatic behaviour. Keith Stanovich characterizes this as a Panglossian position in the debate — that humans are fundamentally rational and any variance between the normative position and empirical outcomes may be explained by such adjustments.".
- Great_Rationality_Debate thumbnail Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg?width=300.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageExternalLink gg_how_1991.pdf.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageID "43376126".
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageLength "2703".
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageOutDegree "15".
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageRevisionID "618226490".
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Category:Philosophy_of_mind.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Category:Reasoning.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Category:Underlying_principles_of_microeconomic_behavior.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Cognition.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Economics.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Expected_value.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Experimental_psychology.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Gerd_Gigerenzer.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Keith_Stanovich.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Normative.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Optimism.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink Rationality.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink St._Petersburg_paradox.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLink File:Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageWikiLinkText "Great Rationality Debate".
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Citation.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Orphan.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Philosophy-stub.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Sfn.
- Great_Rationality_Debate subject Category:Philosophy_of_mind.
- Great_Rationality_Debate subject Category:Reasoning.
- Great_Rationality_Debate subject Category:Underlying_principles_of_microeconomic_behavior.
- Great_Rationality_Debate hypernym Question.
- Great_Rationality_Debate type Work.
- Great_Rationality_Debate comment "The Rationality Debate — also called the Great Rationality Debate — is the question of whether humans are rational or not. This issue is a topic in the study of cognition and is important in fields such as economics where it is relevant to the theories of market efficiency.Many studies in experimental psychology have shown that humans often reason in a way that is inaccurate or imperfect — that they do not naturally chose the ideal method or solution.".
- Great_Rationality_Debate label "Great Rationality Debate".
- Great_Rationality_Debate sameAs Q18207531.
- Great_Rationality_Debate sameAs m.011c956b.
- Great_Rationality_Debate sameAs Q18207531.
- Great_Rationality_Debate wasDerivedFrom Great_Rationality_Debate?oldid=618226490.
- Great_Rationality_Debate depiction Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg.
- Great_Rationality_Debate isPrimaryTopicOf Great_Rationality_Debate.