Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Easley_v._Cromartie> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 triples per page.
- Easley_v._Cromartie abstract "Easley v. Cromartie, 532 US 234 (2001), also known as Hunt v. Cromartie, was a U.S. Supreme Court case. The court's ruling on April 18, 2001 stated that redistricting for political reasons did not violate Federal Civil Rights Law banning race-based gerrymandering. (Case No. 99-1864).The Supreme Court held in the case that as Southern blacks tend to vote for the Democratic Party, North Carolina's 12th congressional district was drawn based upon voting behavior, instead of upon racial characteristics. The allegedly odd-shaped district was allowed to stand.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageID "182958".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageLength "2882".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageOutDegree "17".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageRevisionID "699889580".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink African_Americans.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:2001_in_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:2001_in_United_States_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:Congressional_districts_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:Legal_history_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Civil_and_political_rights.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Democratic_Party_(United_States).
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Gerrymandering.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Hunt_v._Cromartie.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_532.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink North_Carolinas_12th_congressional_district.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Shaw_v._Reno.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Southern_United_States.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLinkText "Easley v. Cromartie".
- Easley_v._Cromartie arguedate "--11-27".
- Easley_v._Cromartie argueyear "2000".
- Easley_v._Cromartie decidedate "--04-18".
- Easley_v._Cromartie decideyear "2001".
- Easley_v._Cromartie dissent "Thomas".
- Easley_v._Cromartie fullname "Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie holding "The District Court's conclusion that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries is based on clearly erroneous findings.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie joindissent "Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy".
- Easley_v._Cromartie joinmajority "Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg".
- Easley_v._Cromartie litigants "Easley v. Cromartie".
- Easley_v._Cromartie majority "Breyer".
- Easley_v._Cromartie scotus "1994".
- Easley_v._Cromartie uspage "234".
- Easley_v._Cromartie usvol "532".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUS-stub.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:2001_in_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:2001_in_United_States_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:Congressional_districts_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:Legal_history_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Case.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type District.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type LegalCase.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type UnitOfWork.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type District.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Redirect.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Situation.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Thing.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Q2334719.
- Easley_v._Cromartie comment "Easley v. Cromartie, 532 US 234 (2001), also known as Hunt v. Cromartie, was a U.S. Supreme Court case. The court's ruling on April 18, 2001 stated that redistricting for political reasons did not violate Federal Civil Rights Law banning race-based gerrymandering. (Case No.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie label "Easley v. Cromartie".
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs Q5327543.
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs m.018_f5.
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs Q5327543.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wasDerivedFrom Easley_v._Cromartie?oldid=699889580.
- Easley_v._Cromartie isPrimaryTopicOf Easley_v._Cromartie.
- Easley_v._Cromartie name "Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".