Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 triples per page.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com abstract "DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P., 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014), is the first United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of computer-implemented patent claims since the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Both Alice and DDR Holdings are legal decisions relevant to the debate about whether software and business methods are patentable subject matter under Title 35 of the United States Code §101. The Federal Circuit applied the framework articulated in Alice to uphold the validity of the patents on webpage display technology at issue in DDR Holdings.In Alice, the Supreme Court held that a computer implementation of an abstract idea, which is not itself eligible for a patent, does not by itself transform that idea into something that is patent eligible. According to the Supreme Court, in order to be patent eligible, what is claimed must be more than the abstract idea. The implementation of the idea must be something beyond the \"routine,\" \"conventional\" or \"generic.\" In DDR Holdings, the Federal Circuit, applying the Alice analytical framework, upheld the validity of DDR’s patent on its webpage display technology.".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageExternalLink ddr-holdings.html.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageExternalLink DDR%20HOLDINGS,%20LLC%20v.%20HOTELS.COM,%20L.P..
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageExternalLink 13-1505-2014-12-05.html.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageID "45544472".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageLength "34270".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageOutDegree "46".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageRevisionID "693674603".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Appeal.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Bilski_v._Kappos.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Business_method_patent.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Category:2015_in_United_States_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Category:Software_patent_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_patent_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Damages.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Defendant.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Digital_River.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Evan_Wallach.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Expedia_(website).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink File:DDR_chart.jpg.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Framing_(World_Wide_Web).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink HTML_element.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Haldane_Robert_Mayer.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Hotels.com.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Inventive_step_and_non-obviousness.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Judgment_(law).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Judgment_as_a_matter_of_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Jury_trial.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Lawsuit.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories,_Inc..
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Motion_in_United_States_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Novelty_(patent).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Orbitz.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Patent_infringement.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Patentable_subject_matter.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Raymond_T._Chen.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Settlement_(litigation).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Software_patent.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Software_patents_under_United_States_patent_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Sufficiency_of_disclosure.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Title_35_of_the_United_States_Code.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Travelocity.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Ultramercial.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Texas.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Utility_(patent).
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLink Verdict.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageWikiLinkText "DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com arguedate "--05-06".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com argueyear "2014".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com citations "25920.0".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com course "Education Program:University of California, Berkeley/Cyberlaw".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com decidedate "--12-05".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com decideyear "2014".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com dissent "Mayer".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com docket "2013".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com fullname "DDR Holdings, LLC, plaintiff-appellee v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al., defendants, and National Leisure Group, Inc. and World Travel Holdings, Inc., defendants-appellants".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com holding "Patents claims to a system that addressed a problem particular to Internet businesses by implementing unconventional computer processes were directed to patent eligible subject matter.".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com joinmajority "Wallach".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com judges "Senior Circuit Judge Haldane Robert Mayer, Circuit Judge Raymond T. Chen, and Circuit Judge Evan Wallach".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com lawsapplied "35".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com litigants "DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com majority "Chen".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com oralargument ddr-holdings.html.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com prior "17280.0".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com term "Spring 2015".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Citation_needed.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Course_assignment.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_COA_case.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Smallcaps.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:West.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com subject Category:2015_in_United_States_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com subject Category:Software_patent_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com subject Category:United_States_patent_case_law.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com comment "DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P., 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014), is the first United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision to uphold the validity of computer-implemented patent claims since the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Both Alice and DDR Holdings are legal decisions relevant to the debate about whether software and business methods are patentable subject matter under Title 35 of the United States Code §101.".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com label "DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com".
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com sameAs Q20720611.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com sameAs m.012z6qlk.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com sameAs Q20720611.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com wasDerivedFrom DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com?oldid=693674603.
- DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com isPrimaryTopicOf DDR_Holdings_v._Hotels.com.