Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Criticism_of_Wikipedia> ?p ?o }
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia abstract "Criticism of Wikipedia—of the content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open-source encyclopedia of subject-entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article-layout; the existence of systemic bias, of gender bias, and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (facilitating editorial vandalism); the existence of social stratification (allowing cliques); and over-complicated rules (allowing editorial quarrels), which conditions permit the misuse of Wikipedia.Unreliable content: in \"Wikipedia: The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge\" (2010), Edwin Black characterized the editorial content of articles as a mixture of \"truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods\". In that vein, in \"Wisdom?: More like Dumbness of the Crowds\" (2011), Oliver Kamm said that the encyclopedic articles usually are dominated by the editors with the loudest and most persistent editorial voices (talk pages and edit summaries), usually by an interest group with an ideological “axe to grind” on the subject, topic, or theme of the article in question.Politics and ideology: in \"The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Wikipedia\" (2012), by Timothy Messer–Kruse, and in \"You Just Type in What You are Looking for: Undergraduates' Use of Library Resources vs. Wikipedia\" (2012), by Mónica Colón–Aguirre and Rachel A. Fleming–May, the authors analyzed and criticized the undue-weight policy (relative importance of a given source), and concluded that, because the purpose of Wikipedia is not about providing correct and definitive information about a subject, but to present, as editorially dominant, the majority-opinion perspective taken by the authors of the sources for the article; therefore, the uneven application of the undue-weight policy creates omissions (of fact and of interpretation) that might give the reader false knowledge about the subject matter, which knowledge the reader has based upon the factually-incomplete content of the Wikipedia article.Hostile environment: in Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia (2014), Dariusz Jemielniak (a Wikipedia steward), said that the complexity of the rules and laws governing editorial content and the behavior of the editors is a burden for new editors and a licence for the “office politics” of disruptive editors. In the follow-up article, \"The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Wikipedia\" (2014), Jemielniak said that abridging and rewriting the editorial rules-and-laws of Wikipedia for clarity of purpose and simplicity of application would resolve the bureaucratic bottleneck of too many rules. In The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity is Causing its Decline (2013), Aaron Halfaker said that the over-complicated rules and laws of Wikipedia unintentionally provoked the decline in editorial participation that began in 2009 — frightening away new editors who otherwise would contribute to Wikipedia.Misuse: in \"Wikipedia or Wickedpedia?\" (2008), the Hoover Institution said that Wikipedia is an unreliable resource for correct knowledge, information, and facts about a subject, because, as an open-source website, the editorial content of the articles is readily subjected to manipulation and propaganda. Therefore, in academia, the handbook Academic Integrity at MIT (2014), officially informs students that Wikipedia is not a reliable academic source, that “the bibliography published at the end of the Wikipedia entry may point you to potential sources. However, do not assume that these sources are reliable — use the same criteria to judge them as you would any other source. Do not consider the Wikipedia bibliography as a replacement for your own research.”".
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&diff=234778085&oldid=234741793.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink the-geographically-uneven-coverage-of-wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink a-compendium-of-wikipedia-criticism.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageID "5034470".
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageLength "118680".
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageOutDegree "299".
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageRevisionID "708340077".
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink ABC_World_News_Tonight.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Aaron_Halfaker.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Abraham_Lincoln.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Advocacy_group.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Al_Jazeera.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Alan_Mcilwraith.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Alejandro_Murguía.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink American_Broadcasting_Company.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink American_Civil_War.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink American_Heritage_(magazine).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Andrew_Keen.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Andrew_Schlafly.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Answers.com.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Arbitration_Committee.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Associated_Press.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Authority_(sociology).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink BBC.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Belief.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Benjamin_Mako_Hill.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Bill_Frist.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Black_history.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Blind_experiment.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink CBS.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Call_centre.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cambridge_University_Press.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cancer.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Category:Criticisms_of_software_and_websites.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Category:Critics_of_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Catholic_Church.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Censorship_of_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Central_Intelligence_Agency.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Change.org.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Chaos_Computer_Club.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Child_protection.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Chinese_art.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Church_of_Scientology.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Citizendium.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Clay_Shirky.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Collectivism.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Computer.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Conservapedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Conservatism.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Conservative_Party_(UK).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Coronation_Street.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cuba.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cyberspace.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cyrus_Cylinder.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Cyrus_the_Great.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Dale_Hoiberg.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Dariusz_Jemielniak.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink David_Cameron.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink David_Saranga.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Defamation.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Dell.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Democratic_Congressional_Campaign_Committee.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Diebold.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Digital_Maoism:_The_Hazards_of_the_New_Online_Collectivism.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Edwin_Black.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Ejaculation.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Encarta.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Encyclopedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Encyclopædia_Britannica.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Energy_(esotericism).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink English_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Engrish.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Eric_Cantor.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Freedom_of_thought.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink GNU_Free_Documentation_License.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Gamergate_controversy.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Gawker.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Gene_Weingarten.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink George_W._Bush.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink German_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Global_warming.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Government_of_Australia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Graduation.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Greenhouse_effect.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hacker_(term).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hardcore_pornography.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Heavy_metal_music.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink High_school_dropouts.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hillary_Clinton.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Historical_revisionism_(negationism).
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink History_of_Wikipedia.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hoax.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hugo_Chávez.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Human_Events.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hurricane_Frances.
- Criticism_of_Wikipedia wikiPageWikiLink Hélène_Mandroux.