Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cripps_question> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 triples per page.
- Cripps_question abstract "In patent law, the Cripps question is:\"Was it for all practical purpose obvious to any skilled chemist in the state of chemical knowledge existing at the date of the patent which consists of the chemical literature available (a selection of which appears in the Particulars of Objections) and his general chemical knowledge, that he could manufacture valuable therapeutic agents by making the higher alkyl resorcinols; ... ?\"It was posed by Stafford Cripps in a British patent case about n-hexyl resorcinol, Sharp & Dohme Inc v Boots Pure Drug Company Ltd and approved by the Master of the Rolls Lord Hanworth in the Court of Appeal's judgment. If the answer was yes the patent was invalid for lack of inventive step or obviousness (or, in the terminology used at the time, want of subject matter). Referred to later as the Cripps question, this way of formulating the issue of inventive step in English law was deployed for many years thereafter. The Cripps question was noted by Lord Reid in the House of Lords in Technograph Printed Circuits v Mills & Rockley, a case about a printed circuit board.".
- Cripps_question wikiPageExternalLink patweb07.htm.
- Cripps_question wikiPageID "20647392".
- Cripps_question wikiPageLength "1425".
- Cripps_question wikiPageOutDegree "9".
- Cripps_question wikiPageRevisionID "653751705".
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_Kingdom_patent_law.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink English_law.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Inventive_step_and_non-obviousness.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Master_of_the_Rolls.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Patent.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Printed_circuit_board.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Resorcinol.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLink Stafford_Cripps.
- Cripps_question wikiPageWikiLinkText "Cripps question".
- Cripps_question wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Cripps_question subject Category:United_Kingdom_patent_law.
- Cripps_question comment "In patent law, the Cripps question is:\"Was it for all practical purpose obvious to any skilled chemist in the state of chemical knowledge existing at the date of the patent which consists of the chemical literature available (a selection of which appears in the Particulars of Objections) and his general chemical knowledge, that he could manufacture valuable therapeutic agents by making the higher alkyl resorcinols; ...".
- Cripps_question label "Cripps question".
- Cripps_question sameAs Q5185849.
- Cripps_question sameAs m.051wwzl.
- Cripps_question sameAs Q5185849.
- Cripps_question wasDerivedFrom Cripps_question?oldid=653751705.
- Cripps_question isPrimaryTopicOf Cripps_question.