Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 triples per page.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee abstract "Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44 was a 2004 decision by the House of Lords on the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on freedom of expression. The Act, particularly Section 12, cautioned the courts to only grant remedies that would restrict publication before trial where it is \"likely\" that the trial will establish that the publication would not be allowed. Banerjee, an accountant with Cream Holdings, obtained documents which she claimed contained evidence of illegal and unsound practices on Cream's part and gave them to the Liverpool Daily Post & Echo, who ran a series of articles on 13 and 14 June 2002 asserting that a director of Cream had been bribing a local council official in Liverpool. Cream applied for an emergency injunction on 18 June in the High Court of Justice, where Lloyd J decided on 5 July that Cream had shown \"a real prospect of success\" at trial, granting the injunction. This judgment was confirmed by the Court of Appeal on 13 February 2003.Leave was given to appeal to the House of Lords, where a judgment was given on 14 October 2004 by Lord Nicholls, with the other judges assenting. In it, Nicholls said that the test required by the Human Rights Act, \"more likely than not\", was a higher standard than \"a real prospect of success\", and that the Act \"makes the likelihood of success at the trial an essential element in the court's consideration of whether to make an interim order\", asserting that in similar cases courts should be reluctant to grant interim injunctions unless it can be shown that the claimant is \"more likely than not\" to succeed. At the same time, he admitted that the \"real prospect of success\" test was not necessarily insufficient, granting the appeal nonetheless because Lloyd J had ignored the public interest element of the disclosure. As the first confidentiality case brought after the Human Rights Act, Cream is the leading case used in British \"breach of confidentiality\" cases.".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageExternalLink 44.html.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageID "26304601".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageLength "9704".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageOutDegree "34".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageRevisionID "636555168".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Brenda_Hale,_Baroness_Hale_of_Richmond.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink British_and_Irish_Legal_Information_Institute.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Case_citation.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Category:2004_in_British_law.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Category:2004_in_case_law.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Donald_Nicholls,_Baron_Nicholls_of_Birkenhead.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink European_Convention_on_Human_Rights.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Harry_Woolf,_Baron_Woolf.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink High_Court_of_Justice.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Human_Rights_Act_1998.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Judiciary_of_England_and_Wales.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Leonard_Hoffmann,_Baron_Hoffmann.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Liverpool_Echo.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Mary_Arden_(judge).
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Richard_Scott,_Baron_Scott_of_Foscote.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLink Stephen_Sedley.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageWikiLinkText "Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee citations "[2004] UKHL 44".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee court Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee dateDecided "2004-10-14".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee fullName "Cream Holdings Limited & Others v Chumki Banerjee & The Liverpool Daily Post & Echo Limited".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee judges Donald_Nicholls,_Baron_Nicholls_of_Birkenhead.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee judges "Lady Hale".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee judges "Lord Hoffmann".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee judges "Lord Scott".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee judges "Lord Woolf".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee keywords "confidentiality, human rights".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee name "Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee opinions "Nicholls".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee priorActions "Court of Appeal of England and Wales".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee priorActions "High Court of Justice Chancery Division".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee transcripts "transcript at BAILII".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_book.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Good_article.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_Court_Case.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee subject Category:2004_in_British_law.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee subject Category:2004_in_case_law.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee subject Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee hypernym Decision.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee comment "Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44 was a 2004 decision by the House of Lords on the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on freedom of expression. The Act, particularly Section 12, cautioned the courts to only grant remedies that would restrict publication before trial where it is \"likely\" that the trial will establish that the publication would not be allowed.".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee label "Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee sameAs Q5183353.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee sameAs m.0b75j2y.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee sameAs Q5183353.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee wasDerivedFrom Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee?oldid=636555168.
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee isPrimaryTopicOf Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee.