Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cahaly_v._LaRosa> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 triples per page.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa abstract "Cahaly v. LaRosa is a lawsuit filed in federal court in 2013 that challenged South Carolina's law prohibiting most types of unsolicited consumer and political calls made by Automatic Dialing and Announcing Devices (ADAD), also known as \"robocalls\". The plaintiff won in U.S. district court in June 2014, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in part, while vacating part in August 2015.".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-4thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageID "48113869".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageLength "7407".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageOutDegree "19".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageRevisionID "707304325".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Albert_Diaz.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Auto_dialer.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Henry_McMaster.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink J._Michelle_Childs.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink James_A._Wynn,_Jr..
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Nancy_Pelosi.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Robocall.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink South_Carolina.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink South_Carolina_Law_Enforcement_Division.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink South_Carolina_primary.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink Stephanie_Thacker.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageWikiLink United_States_federal_judge.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa caption "No. 14-1651, 14-1680".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa citations "Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 135 S. Ct. 2218".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa dateDecided "2015-08-06".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa fullName "Defendants - Appellants.".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa fullName "Paul C. LaRosa, ; Reginald I. Lloyd; South Carolina Law Enforcement Division,".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa fullName "Plaintiff - Appellee,".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa fullName "Robert C. Cahaly,".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa fullName "v.".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa holding "The law was found unconstitutional under the First Amendment, since robocalls with certain messages were singled out for prohibition while robocalls with other messages were allowed . Judgment for the plaintiffs affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with instructions 3–0, with Diaz, A. writing for the majority; Wynn, J.A. and Thacker, S. concurring.".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa imagesize "120".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa italicTitle "yes".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa judge James_A._Wynn,_Jr..
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa judge "Albert Diaz, and".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa judge "Stephanie Thacker, U.S. Circuit Judges".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa name "Cahaly v. LaRosa".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa priorActions "259200.0".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Quote.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Section_link.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa comment "Cahaly v. LaRosa is a lawsuit filed in federal court in 2013 that challenged South Carolina's law prohibiting most types of unsolicited consumer and political calls made by Automatic Dialing and Announcing Devices (ADAD), also known as \"robocalls\". The plaintiff won in U.S. district court in June 2014, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in part, while vacating part in August 2015.".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa label "Cahaly v. LaRosa".
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa wasDerivedFrom Cahaly_v._LaRosa?oldid=707304325.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-4thCircuit-Seal.png.
- Cahaly_v._LaRosa isPrimaryTopicOf Cahaly_v._LaRosa.