Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://citation.dbpedia.org/hash/ac4a0c819c09ceab564cd2378a43a25bfe4703832aa7cb30734a1fb17f0fd4f4> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 triples per page.
- ac4a0c819c09ceab564cd2378a43a25bfe4703832aa7cb30734a1fb17f0fd4f4 date "August 2014".
- ac4a0c819c09ceab564cd2378a43a25bfe4703832aa7cb30734a1fb17f0fd4f4 isCitedBy Felony_disenfranchisement.
- ac4a0c819c09ceab564cd2378a43a25bfe4703832aa7cb30734a1fb17f0fd4f4 reason "In Hunter v. Underwood, the S.C. explicitly did not endorse the constitutionality of designing disenfranchisement to deprive poor whites suffrage to undermine support for an opposition party; but there then was no further need for them to decide finally one way or the other. This means that the question was left open.".