Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://citation.dbpedia.org/hash/33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 triples per page.
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d edition "electronic".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d editor1Last "Ferguson".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d editor2Last "Packer".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d isCitedBy Christian_mortalism.
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d pages "28–29".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d quote "Gn. 2:7 refers to God forming Adam ‘from the dust of the ground’ and breathing ‘into his nostrils the breath of life’, so that man becomes a ‘living being’. The word ‘being’ translates the Hebrew word nep̄eš which, though often translated by the Eng. word ‘soul’, ought not to be interpreted in the sense suggested by Hellenistic thought . It should rather be understood in its own context within the OT as indicative of men and women as living beings or persons in relationship to God and other people. The lxx translates this Heb. word nep̄eš with the Gk. word psychē, which explains the habit of interpreting this OT concept in the light of Gk. use of psychē. Yet it is surely more appropriate to understand the use of psychē in the light of the OT’s use of nep̄eš. According to Gn. 2, any conception of the soul as a separate part or division of our being would seem to be invalid. Similarly, the popular debate concerning whether human nature is a bipartite or tripartite being has the appearance of a rather ill-founded and unhelpful irrelevancy. The human person is a ‘soul’ by virtue of being a ‘body’ made alive by the ‘breath’ of God.".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d title "New Dictionary of Theology".
- 33d04842b8ac2057f5a75f3475ef3e9eb794257377d69a8361a99c2a6094e99d year "2000".