Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN9780300066067> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 13 of
13
with 100 triples per page.
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 first "M.A.".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 isCitedBy Logical_positivism.
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 isCitedBy Positivism.
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 isbn "9780300066067".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 last "Bunge".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 lccn "lc96004399".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 page "317".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 publisher "Yale University Press".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 quote "To conclude, logical positivism was progressive compared with the classical positivism of Ptolemy, Hume, d'Alembert, Compte, John Stuart Mill, and Ernst Mach. It was even more so by comparison with its contemporary rivals—neo-Thomisism, neo-Kantianism, intuitionism, dialectical materialism, phenomenology, and existentialism. However, neo-positivism failed dismally to give a faithful account of science, whether natural or social. It failed because it remained anchored to sense-data and to a phenomenalist metaphysics, overrated the power of induction and underrated that of hypothesis, and denounced realism and materialism as metaphysical nonsense. Although it has never been practiced consistently in the advanced natural sciences and has been criticized by many philosophers, notably Popper , logical positivism remains the tacit philosophy of many scientists. Regrettably, the anti-positivism fashionable in the metatheory of social science is often nothing but an excuse for sloppiness and wild speculation.".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 quote "To conclude, logical positivism was progressive compared with the classical positivism of Ptolemy, Hume, d'Alembert, Compte, Mill, and Mach. It was even more so by comparison with its contemporary rivals—neo-Thomisism, neo-Kantianism, intuitionism, dialectical materialism, phenomenology, and existentialism. However, neo-positivism failed dismally to give a faithful account of science, whether natural or social. It failed because it remained anchored to sense-data and to a phenomenalist metaphysics, overrated the power of induction and underrated that of hypothesis, and denounced realism and materialism as metaphysical nonsense. Although it has never been practiced consistently in the advanced natural sciences and has been criticized by many philosophers, notably Popper , logical positivism remains the tacit philosophy of many scientists. Regrettably, the anti-positivism fashionable in the metatheory of social science is often nothing but an excuse for sloppiness and wild speculation.".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 title "Finding Philosophy in Social Science".
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 url books?id=8YAV43gVMsIC&pg=PA317.
- books?vid=ISBN9780300066067 year "1996".