Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://books.google.com/books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 13 of
13
with 100 triples per page.
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 authorlink "Annie Besant".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 first "Annie Wood".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 isCitedBy Annie_Besant.
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 isCitedBy Criticism_of_the_Bible.
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 last "Besant".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 page "261".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 publisher "R. Forder".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 quote "That before about A.D. 180 there is no trace of (FOUR) gospels among the Christians. ...As it is not pretended by any that there is any mention of four Gospels before the time of Irenaeus, excepting this "harmony," pleaded by some as dated about A.D. 170 and by others as between 170 and 180, it would be sheer waste of time and space to prove further a point admitted on all hands. This step of our argument is, then on solid and unassailable ground —That before about A.D. 180 there is no trace of (FOUR) gospels among the Christians. That, before that date, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are not selected as the four evangelists. This position necessarily follows from the preceding one [D.], since four evangelists could not be selected until four Gospels were recognised. Here, again, Dr. Giles supports the argument we are building up. He says : "Justin Martyr never once mentions by name the evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. This circumstance is of great importance ; for those who assert that our four canonical Gospels are contemporary records of our Saviour's ministry, ascribe them to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and to no other writers."".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 quote "That before about A.D. 180 there is no trace of FOUR gospels among the Christians. ...As it is not pretended by any that there is any mention of four Gospels before the time of Irenaeus, excepting this "harmony," pleaded by some as dated about A.D. 170 and by others as between 170 and 180, it would be sheer waste of time and space to prove further a point admitted on all hands. This step of our argument is, then on solid and unassailable ground —That before about A.D. 180 there is no trace of FOUR gospels among the Christians. That, before that date, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are not selected as the four evangelists. This position necessarily follows from the preceding one [D.], since four evangelists could not be selected until four Gospels were recognised. Here, again, Dr. Giles supports the argument we are building up. He says : "Justin Martyr never once mentions by name the evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. This circumstance is of great importance ; for those who assert that our four canonical Gospels are contemporary records of our Saviour's ministry, ascribe them to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and to no other writers."".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 title "Christianity, Its Evidences, Its Origin, Its Morality, Its History".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 title "Christianity: Its Evidences, Its Origin, Its Morality, Its History".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 url "http://books.google.com/books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261".
- books?id=YKlBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA261 year "1893".