Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { ?s <http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions> ?o }
- British_Crane_Hire_Corp_Ltd_v_Ipswich_Plant_Hire_Ltd opinions Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning.
- British_Crane_Hire_Corp_Ltd_v_Ipswich_Plant_Hire_Ltd opinions Master_of_the_Rolls.
- British_Eagle_International_Airlines_Ltd_v_Compagnie_Nationale_Air_France opinions "Lord Cross, Lord Morris".
- British_Steel_Corp_v_Cleveland_Bridge_and_Engineering_Co_Ltd opinions "Robert Goff J".
- British_Westinghouse_Electric_and_Manufacturing_Co_Ltd_v_Underground_Electric_Rlys_Co_of_London_Ltd opinions "Viscount Haldane LC".
- Broderbund_Software_Inc._v._Unison_World,_Inc. opinions "Defendant adjudged to have infringed the copyright of plaintiff on the audiovisual displays of the computer program.".
- Bryson_v_Three_Foot_Six_Ltd opinions "Blanchard J".
- Bunge_Corp_v_Tradax_Export_SA opinions "Lord Wilberforce, Lord Scarman, Lord Lowry, Lord Roskill".
- Bunning_v_Cross opinions "Improperly or illegally obtained does not inherently render it inadmissible; however, it confers upon a judge a discretion to reject it .".
- Burger_King_Corporation_v_Hungry_Jacks_Pty_Ltd opinions "* Hungry Jack's breach of clause 2.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract, because clause 2.1 was not an essential term * clause 15.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract * Burger King was in breach of an implied term of good faith".
- Burgess_v_Rawnsley opinions "Lord Denning MR".
- Burnett_v._National_Enquirer,_Inc. opinions ""Actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times v. Sullivan in order to be liable for defaming a "public figure". The National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of California libel law.".
- Burnie_Port_Authority_v_General_Jones_Pty_Ltd opinions "Authority liable to General Jones under ordinary principles of negligence; appeal dismissed.".
- Byron_v._Rajneesh_Foundation_International opinions "Jury award to Byron.".
- Byron_v._Rajneesh_Foundation_International opinions "Subsequent motions denied.".
- C._H._v._Oliva opinions "Dissent: Alito".
- C._H._v._Oliva opinions "Majority: Stapleton".
- CMS_Dolphin_Ltd_v_Simonet opinions "Lawrence Collins J".
- CTN_Cash_and_Carry_Ltd_v_Gallaher_Ltd opinions "Steyn LJ".
- C_Czarnikow_Ltd_v_Koufos opinions "Lord Reid, Lord Morris, Lord Hodson, Lord Pearce and Lord Upjohn".
- Cadder_v_HM_Advocate opinions "By not being able to have access to a solicitor prior to being interviewed by the police, Cadder's rights under Article 6(1) ECHR had been breached.".
- Cahoon_v._Cummings opinions "Unanimous opinion by Boehm".
- California_foie_gras_law opinions "In a unanimous opinion authored by Judge Pregerson, the court held that the Attorney General was not subject to Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit; that the Governor and state of California were entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity and were dismissed from the suit; and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that there was no serious question of a Due Process violation or a violation of the Commerce Clause, and affirmed the denial of the motion.".
- California_v._Murray opinions "Murray found guilty of involuntary manslaughter".
- Cambridge_Water_Co_Ltd_v_Eastern_Counties_Leather_plc opinions Robert_Goff,_Baron_Goff_of_Chieveley.
- Campbell_v._General_Dynamics_Government_Systems_Corp. opinions "Concurrence: Lipez".
- Campbell_v._General_Dynamics_Government_Systems_Corp. opinions "Opinion of the Court: Selya".
- Candler_v_Crane,_Christmas_&_Co opinions "Cohen LJ, Asquith LJ and Denning LJ".
- Cantor_Fitzgernald_International_v_Horkulak opinions "Potter LJ, Carnworth LJ and Bodey J".
- Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_Co opinions "Lindley LJ, Bowen LJ and AL Smith LJ".
- Carmichael_v_National_Power_plc opinions "Lord Irvine LC, Lord Hoffmann".
- Carter_v_Boehm opinions William_Murray,_1st_Earl_of_Mansfield.
- Cassidy_v_Ministry_of_Health opinions "Denning LJ".
- Castle_Rock_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Carol_Publishing_Group_Inc. opinions "Book containing Seinfeld trivia questions satisfied both quantitative and qualitative analysis to establish prima facie case of copyright infringement. Book did not constitute ‘’fair use’’ of Seinfeld".
- Castlemaine_Tooheys_Ltd_v_South_Australia opinions "If a law is protectionist in nature, but has a non-protectionist purpose, the means chosen to attain the non-protectionist purpose must be necessary, or appropriate and adapted, and in this case, the higher deposits on non-refillable beer bottles was not found to be a proportionate means.".
- Cattanach_v_Melchior opinions "Appeal dismissed. Benefits received by having a child not legally relevant to the head of damage that compensates for cost of raising and maintaining the child.".
- Centrum_voor_Gelijkheid_van_Kansen_en_voor_Racismebestrijding_v_Firma_Feryn_NV opinions celex.jsf?celex=62007CC0054&lang1=en&type=TXT&ancre=.
- Cesan_v_The_Queen opinions "1".
- Cesan_v_The_Queen opinions "2".
- Chamberlain_Group,_Inc._v._Skylink_Technologies,_Inc. opinions "Maker of replacement garage door openers did not violate the anti-trafficking provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act , because owners of GDOs were authorized to access Plaintiff's GDO software and Plaintiff failed to allege or show a nexus between access and copyright infringement. Plaintiff had the burden to prove that Skylink's Model 39 garage door openers violated the DMCA and failed to do so. Summary judgment upheld in favor of Skylink.".
- Chan_Hiang_Leng_Colin_v_Public_Prosecutor opinions "The deregistration of the Singapore Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and banning of Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society publications are neither unconstitutional nor ultra vires. The right to freedom of religion guaranteed by Article 15(1) of the Constitution can be restricted on the ground of public order.".
- Chandler_v_Cape_plc opinions "Wyn Williams J ; Arden LJ".
- Chappell_&_Co_Ltd_v_Nestle_Co_Ltd opinions "Lord Somervell".
- Chartaprops_v_Silberman opinions "Nugent JA, Ponnan JA".
- Chartbrook_Ltd_v_Persimmon_Homes_Ltd opinions "Lord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness Hale".
- Chicago_Lawyers_Committee_For_Civil_Rights_Under_Law_v._Craigslist,_Inc. opinions "Majority: Easterbrook".
- Childs_v_Desormeaux opinions "Unanimous decision: McLachlin".
- Chng_Suan_Tze_v_Minister_for_Home_Affairs opinions "Exercise of discretion by President and Minister for Home Affairs under ss. 8 and 10 of the Internal Security Act subject to judicial review by a court as an objective rather than subjective test applies.".
- Citizens_for_Equal_Protection_v._Bruning opinions 052604P.pdf.
- City_and_Westminster_Properties_(1934)_Ltd_v_Mudd opinions "Harman J".
- City_of_London_Building_Society_v_Flegg opinions "Lord Templeman, Lord Oliver".
- Cline_v._American_Aggregates_Corp. opinions "Concurrence by Holmes".
- Cline_v._American_Aggregates_Corp. opinions "Majority by James P. Celebrezze".
- Clyde_Engineering_Co_Ltd_v_Cowburn opinions "The New South Wales Act was held to be inconsistent with the Commonwealth award".
- Co-op_Insurance_Society_Ltd_v_Argyll_Stores_Holdings_Ltd opinions "Lord Hoffmann".
- Cole_v_Whitfield opinions "Where a law creates a discriminatory and protectionist burden on interstate trade and commerce and is not pursuant or incidental to a non-protectionist purpose, it will be in breach of Section 92 of the Australian Constitution.".
- Coleman_v_Attridge_Law opinions LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62006C0303:EN:HTML.
- Coleman_v_Power opinions "The conviction for using insulting words should be set aside, and the appeal allowed.".
- College_Network,_Inc._v._Moore_Educational_Publishers,_Inc. opinions "Court vacated the tortious interference relief awarded to Moore Educational, but otherwise affirmed the district court ruling.".
- Combe_v_Combe opinions Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning.
- Combet_v_Commonwealth opinions "Expenditure of public funds on advertising promoting Work Choices was authorised by the Appropriation Act 2005-2006".
- Commerzbank_AG_v_Keen opinions "Mummery LJ, Moses LJ".
- Commonwealth_v._Abu-Jamal opinions "Mumia Abu-Jamal convicted of the murder of Daniel Faulkner".
- Commonwealth_v._Kneeland opinions "Dissent: Morton".
- Commonwealth_v._Kneeland opinions "Majority: Shaw".
- Commonwealth_v._Matos opinions "Where police possess neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion, contraband discarded by a person fleeing a police officer are the fruits of an illegal seizure under the greater privacy protections of the Pennsylvania Constitution.".
- Commonwealth_v_Tasmania opinions "' the Commonwealth validly prohibited construction of the dam, by virtue of the World Heritage Act ' any Constitutional restriction preventing the Commonwealth from inhibiting the functions of the States did not apply".
- CompuServe,_Inc._v._Patterson opinions "The order granting Patterson's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was reversed because Patterson had sufficient contacts with Ohio through storing his software and utilizing CompuServe's advertisement network to grant personal jurisdiction.".
- Computer_Associates_International,_Inc._v._Altai_Inc. opinions "This case presents a three-step test, Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison, to determine whether substantial similarity is met when proving copyright infringement for non-literal elements of software. The court held that Altai's rewritten code did not meet the requirements for copyright infringement, and vacated and remanded the ruling on trade secret misappropriation.".
- Congress_Elementary_School_District_v._Warren opinions "Thrown out; Decision sided with Goldwater that the Congress School District was previously in violation of state laws mandating government transparency.".
- Constantine_v_Imperial_Hotels_Ltd opinions "Birkett J".
- Cook_v._Gates opinions "Howard".
- Cook_v._Gates opinions "Saris".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Dissenting Opinion: Abdul Badawi Pasha".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Dissenting Opinion: Bohdan Winiarski".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Dissenting Opinion: Bohuslav Ečer".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Dissenting Opinion: Philadelpho Azevedo".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Dissenting Opinion: Sergei Krylov".
- Corfu_Channel_case opinions "Separate Opinion: Alejandro Álvarez".
- Cotman_v_Brougham opinions "Lord Finlay LC, Lord Parker, Lord Wrenbury and Lord Atkinson".
- Courvoisier_v._Raymond opinions "Unanimous opinion by Hayt".
- Cowan_v_Scargill opinions "Megarry VC".
- Crabb_v_Arun_DC opinions "Lord Denning MR".
- Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee opinions "Nicholls".
- Creen_v_Wright opinions "Lord Coleridge CJ, Archibald LJ and Lindley LJ".
- Cresswell_v_Potter opinions "Megarry J".
- Cridland_v_Federal_Commissioner_of_Taxation opinions "Following the decision in Mullens, when the statute explicitly provides tax benefits for taxpayers in certain circumstances, taxpayers may deliberately enter those circumstances without attracting the anti-avoidance provisions of section 260 of the ITAA 1936".
- Crofter_Hand_Woven_Harris_Tweed_Co_Ltd_v_Veitch opinions John_Simon,_1st_Viscount_Simon.
- Crofter_Hand_Woven_Harris_Tweed_Co_Ltd_v_Veitch opinions Robert_Wright,_Baron_Wright.
- Cumbrian_Newspapers_Group_Ltd_v_Cumberland_&_Westmoreland_Herald_Ltd opinions "Scott J".
- Currie_v_Misa opinions "Lush J".
- Cutter_v_Powell opinions "Lord Kenyon CJ, Ashhurst J, Grose J, Lawrence J".
- DEmden_v_Pedder opinions "attempts by the states to exercise legislative or executive power, in a way that would interfere with the legislative or executive power of the federal government, are, unless expressly authorised by the Constitution, invalid".
- DVD_Copy_Control_Assn,_Inc._v._Bunner opinions "On remand, the California Court of Appeal found that there was not enough evidence to support that CCS was still a trade secret at the time of the injunction. Thus the previously granted injunction unnecessarily burdened free speech and was reversed.".
- Dalgarno_v_Hannah opinions "the case was not of sufficient significance to grant special leave to appeal. The issue of whether the Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal was left undecided.".
- Daniel_v._Waters opinions "Dissent: Celebrezze".
- Daniel_v._Waters opinions "Majority: Edwards".
- Daniels_v_Canada opinions "Persons who are Métis or non-status Indians are "Indians" as the term is used within s 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867.".
- Darkan_v_The_Queen opinions "Jury misdirected as to meaning of "probable consequence", but proviso applies".
- Data_East_USA,_Inc._v._Epyx,_Inc. opinions "The appeals court reversed and remanded, deciding that there was no infringement on the copyright of Data East by Epyx.".