Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Robers_v._United_States> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 triples per page.
- Robers_v._United_States abstract "Robers v. United States No. 12-9012, 572 U.S. 310 (2014) is a US criminal law case. The United States Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision that restitution in cases involving mortgage fraud is determined by the actual money lent not the value of the property. Benjamin Robers had been convicted of mortgage fraud. The District Court had ordered Robers to pay the difference between the amount lent to him and the amount the banks received in selling the houses that had served as collateral for the loans. Robers claimed that the District Court should have instead reduced the restitution amount by the value of the houses on the date the banks took title to them since that was when "part of the property" was "returned." The Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate and District courts.".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink 2013_12_9012.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageID "43446840".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageLength "3292".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageOutDegree "13".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "619574760".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:2014_in_United_States_case_law.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_criminal_case_law.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Criminal_law_of_the_United_States.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Mortgage_fraud.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Restitution.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageWikiLink United_States_district_court.
- Robers_v._United_States arguedate "--02-25".
- Robers_v._United_States argueyear "2014".
- Robers_v._United_States concurrence "Sotomayor".
- Robers_v._United_States decidedate "--05-05".
- Robers_v._United_States decideyear "2014".
- Robers_v._United_States docket "12".
- Robers_v._United_States fullname "Benjamin Robers v. United States".
- Robers_v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Robers_v._United_States.
- Robers_v._United_States holding "A provision of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 requires property crime offenders to pay “an amount equal to the value of the property” minus “the value of any part of the property that is returned.” In that provision, the phrase “any part of the property” refers to the property that was lost as a result of the crime – in this case, involving a fraudulent loan application, the money lent by the bank. The property is not “returned” until it is sold and the victim receives money from the sale. Here, that means that a sentencing court should reduce the amount of restitution by the amount of money the bank received when it sold the houses that were collateral for the fraudulent loans, rather than by the value of the houses when the bank foreclosed on them.".
- Robers_v._United_States joinconcurrence "Ginsburg".
- Robers_v._United_States joinmajority "Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan".
- Robers_v._United_States lawsapplied "Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act".
- Robers_v._United_States litigants "Benjamin Robers v. United States".
- Robers_v._United_States majority "Breyer".
- Robers_v._United_States oralargument 2013_12_9012.
- Robers_v._United_States prior "Plaintiff convicted of mortgage fraud, US Dis. Ct.; Petitioner files motion for recalculation of restitution, 7th Ckt. Ct.".
- Robers_v._United_States scotus "2010".
- Robers_v._United_States subsequent "9".
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUS-case-stub.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Use_mdy_dates.
- Robers_v._United_States wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Robers_v._United_States subject Category:2014_in_United_States_case_law.
- Robers_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Robers_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Robers_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_criminal_case_law.
- Robers_v._United_States type Case.
- Robers_v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Robers_v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Robers_v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Robers_v._United_States type Situation.
- Robers_v._United_States type Thing.
- Robers_v._United_States type Q2334719.
- Robers_v._United_States comment "Robers v. United States No. 12-9012, 572 U.S. 310 (2014) is a US criminal law case. The United States Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision that restitution in cases involving mortgage fraud is determined by the actual money lent not the value of the property. Benjamin Robers had been convicted of mortgage fraud.".
- Robers_v._United_States label "Robers v. United States".
- Robers_v._United_States sameAs m.011jhhy9.
- Robers_v._United_States sameAs Q18390643.
- Robers_v._United_States sameAs Q18390643.
- Robers_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Robers_v._United_States?oldid=619574760.
- Robers_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Robers_v._United_States.
- Robers_v._United_States name "Benjamin Robers v. United States".