Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Darcy_v_Allein> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 triples per page.
- Darcy_v_Allein abstract "Edward Darcy Esquire v Thomas Allin of London Haberdasher (1599) 74 ER 1131 (also spelled as "Allain" or "Allen" and "Allein" but most widely known as the Case of Monopolies), was an early landmark case in English law, establishing that the grant of exclusive rights to produce any article was improper (monopoly). The reasoning behind the outcome of the case, which was decided at a time before courts regularly issued written opinions, was reported by Sir Edward Coke.".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageExternalLink ?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=911&chapter=106358&layout=html&Itemid=27.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageID "1693566".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageLength "3653".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageOutDegree "18".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageRevisionID "636541669".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Antitrust.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Category:1603_in_England.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Category:1603_in_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Category:Edward_Coke_cases.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Category:History_of_competition_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Competition_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Court.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Defendant.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Edward_Coke.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Elizabeth_I_of_England.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink England.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink English_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Landmark_case.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Lists_of_landmark_court_decisions.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Monopoly.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Plaintiff.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Playing_card.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Playing_cards.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink Restraint_of_trade.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink UK_competition_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLink United_Kingdom_competition_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageWikiLinkText "Darcy v Allein".
- Darcy_v_Allein citations "74".
- Darcy_v_Allein court "Queen's Bench".
- Darcy_v_Allein dateDecided "1599-01-01".
- Darcy_v_Allein fullName "Edward Darcy Esquire v Thomas Allin of London Haberdasher".
- Darcy_v_Allein hasPhotoCollection Darcy_v_Allein.
- Darcy_v_Allein keywords "Patent".
- Darcy_v_Allein name "Case of Monopolies".
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Law.
- Darcy_v_Allein wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Darcy_v_Allein subject Category:1603_in_England.
- Darcy_v_Allein subject Category:1603_in_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein subject Category:Edward_Coke_cases.
- Darcy_v_Allein subject Category:History_of_competition_law.
- Darcy_v_Allein hypernym Case.
- Darcy_v_Allein type Person.
- Darcy_v_Allein type Work.
- Darcy_v_Allein type Work.
- Darcy_v_Allein comment "Edward Darcy Esquire v Thomas Allin of London Haberdasher (1599) 74 ER 1131 (also spelled as "Allain" or "Allen" and "Allein" but most widely known as the Case of Monopolies), was an early landmark case in English law, establishing that the grant of exclusive rights to produce any article was improper (monopoly). The reasoning behind the outcome of the case, which was decided at a time before courts regularly issued written opinions, was reported by Sir Edward Coke.".
- Darcy_v_Allein label "Darcy v Allein".
- Darcy_v_Allein sameAs m.05nx_c.
- Darcy_v_Allein sameAs Q5222398.
- Darcy_v_Allein sameAs Q5222398.
- Darcy_v_Allein wasDerivedFrom Darcy_v_Allein?oldid=636541669.
- Darcy_v_Allein isPrimaryTopicOf Darcy_v_Allein.