Matches in DBpedia 2015-10 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Coleman_v._Miller> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 triples per page.
- Coleman_v._Miller abstract "Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939) is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which clarified that if the Congress of the United States—when proposing for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Article V thereof—chooses not to specify a deadline within which the state legislatures (or conventions held in the states) must act upon the proposed amendment, then the proposed amendment remains pending business before the state legislatures (or conventions). The case centered on the Child Labor Amendment, which was proposed for ratification by Congress in 1924. Congress first imposed a ratification deadline on a proposed constitutional amendment in 1917 with its proposal of what became the 18th Amendment. Therefore, it is clear that Congress was quite aware in 1924 that—had it desired to do so—it could have imposed a deadline upon the Child Labor Amendment and Congress simply chose not to.According to Coleman, it is none other than the Congress itself—if and when the Congress should later be presented with valid ratifications from the required number of states—which has the discretion to arbitrate the question of whether too much time has elapsed between Congress' initial proposal of that amendment and the most recent state ratification thereof assuming that, as a consequence of that most recent ratification, the legislatures of (or conventions conducted within) at least three-fourths of the states have ratified that amendment at one time or another.The Coleman ruling—which modified the high Court's earlier 1921 dictum in Dillon v. Gloss—formed the basis of the belated and unusual ratification of the 27th Amendment. The question was discussed in Dillon v. Gloss, but was not necessary to the decision, and thus was not binding in a future case.As of 2015, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment of 1789, the Titles of Nobility Amendment of 1810, the Corwin Amendment of 1861, and the Child Labor Amendment of 1924 technically remain pending before the state legislatures due to the lack of deadlines for ratification in the legislation approved by Congress proposing those amendments.The Coleman decision has been described as reinforcing the political question doctrine which is sometimes espoused by Federal courts in cases wherein the court deems the matter at hand to be properly assigned to the discretion of the legislative branch of the Federal government.".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageID "802684".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageLength "4487".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageOutDegree "23".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageRevisionID "679469259".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Article_Five_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Article_the_First.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Category:1939_in_United_States_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Constitution_Article_Five_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_political_question_doctrine_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Child_Labor_Amendment.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Child_labor_amendment.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Congress_of_the_United_States.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Conventions_within_the_states_to_ratify_an_amendment_to_U.S._Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Corwin_Amendment.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Dillon_v._Gloss.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Eighteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_307.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Political_question.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink State_legislature_(United_States).
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink State_ratifying_conventions.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Congress.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Supreme_Court.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLinkText "Coleman v. Miller".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageWikiLinkText "time limit".
- Coleman_v._Miller arguedate "--10-10".
- Coleman_v._Miller argueyear "1938".
- Coleman_v._Miller citation "59".
- Coleman_v._Miller concurrence "Black".
- Coleman_v._Miller decidedate "--06-05".
- Coleman_v._Miller decideyear "1939".
- Coleman_v._Miller dissent "Butler".
- Coleman_v._Miller fullname "Coleman, et al. v. Miller, Secretary of the Senate of State of Kansas, et al.".
- Coleman_v._Miller hasPhotoCollection Coleman_v._Miller.
- Coleman_v._Miller holding "A proposed amendment to the Federal Constitution is considered pending before the states indefinitely unless Congress establishes a deadline by which the states must act. Further, Congress—not the courts—is responsible for deciding whether an amendment has been validly ratified.".
- Coleman_v._Miller joinconcurrence "Roberts, Frankfurter, Douglas".
- Coleman_v._Miller joindissent "McReynolds".
- Coleman_v._Miller joinmajority "Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas".
- Coleman_v._Miller lawsapplied Article_Five_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Coleman_v._Miller litigants "Coleman v. Miller".
- Coleman_v._Miller majority "Hughes".
- Coleman_v._Miller opinion "Frankfurter".
- Coleman_v._Miller prior "Cert. to the Supreme Court of Kansas".
- Coleman_v._Miller rearguedatea "--04-17".
- Coleman_v._Miller rearguedateb "--04-18".
- Coleman_v._Miller reargueyear "1939".
- Coleman_v._Miller scotus "1939".
- Coleman_v._Miller uspage "433".
- Coleman_v._Miller usvol "307".
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Refimprove.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUSCase.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Coleman_v._Miller wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Wikisource.
- Coleman_v._Miller subject Category:1939_in_United_States_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller subject Category:United_States_Constitution_Article_Five_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Coleman_v._Miller subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court.
- Coleman_v._Miller subject Category:United_States_political_question_doctrine_case_law.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Article.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Case.
- Coleman_v._Miller type LegalCase.
- Coleman_v._Miller type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Coleman_v._Miller type UnitOfWork.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Article.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Situation.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Thing.
- Coleman_v._Miller type Q2334719.
- Coleman_v._Miller comment "Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S.".
- Coleman_v._Miller label "Coleman v. Miller".
- Coleman_v._Miller sameAs m.03d4s_.
- Coleman_v._Miller sameAs Q5143039.
- Coleman_v._Miller sameAs Q5143039.
- Coleman_v._Miller wasDerivedFrom Coleman_v._Miller?oldid=679469259.
- Coleman_v._Miller isPrimaryTopicOf Coleman_v._Miller.
- Coleman_v._Miller name "Coleman, et al. v. Miller, Secretary of the Senate of State of Kansas, et al.".